Bastuji-Garin S, Rzany B, Stern R S, Shear N H, Naldi L, Roujeau J C
Department of Dermatology, Henri-Mondor Hospital, University of Paris XII, Créteil, France.
Arch Dermatol. 1993 Jan;129(1):92-6.
To conduct a prospective case-control study about causative factors of severe bullous erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis, we needed to define criteria for classifying the cases and standardize the collection of data so that cases could be reliably diagnosed according to this classification. Based on review of case histories and photographs of patients, a group of experts proposed a classification based on the pattern of erythema multiforme-like lesions (categorized as typical targets, raised or flat atypical targets, and purpuric macules) and on the extent of epidermal detachment. An atlas illustrating this classification that included photographs and schematic drawings was developed. We compared the evaluations of 28 cases by four nonphysicians relying on the atlas with the evaluations of the same cases by five experts not using the atlas to determine the usefulness of this atlas for classifying cases according to our nosologic schema.
The following consensus classification in five categories was proposed: bullous erythema multiforme, detachment below 10% of the body surface area plus localized "typical targets" or "raised atypical targets"; Stevens-Johnson syndrome, detachment below 10% of the body surface area plus widespread erythematous or purpuric macules or flat atypical targets; overlap Stevens-Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis, detachment between 10% and 30% of the body surface area plus widespread purpuric macules or flat atypical targets; toxic epidermal necrolysis with spots, detachment above 30% of the body surface area plus widespread purpuric macules or flat atypical targets; and toxic epidermal necrolysis without spots, detachment above 10% of the body surface area with large epidermal sheets and without any purpuric macule or target. Using the atlas, the nonexperts showed excellent agreement with the experts.
This study suggests that an illustrated atlas is a useful tool for standardizing the diagnosis of acute severe bullous disorders that are attributed to drugs or infectious agents. Whether the five categories proposed represent distinct etiopathologic entities will require further epidemiologic and laboratory investigations.
为开展一项关于重症大疱性多形红斑、史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症病因的前瞻性病例对照研究,我们需要确定病例分类标准并规范数据收集,以便能依据此分类对病例进行可靠诊断。在查阅患者病历和照片的基础上,一组专家提出了一种基于多形红斑样皮损模式(分为典型靶形、隆起或扁平非典型靶形以及紫癜性斑疹)和表皮剥脱范围的分类方法。编制了一本说明该分类的图谱,其中包括照片和示意图。我们比较了4名非医生依据图谱对28例病例的评估结果与5名未使用图谱的专家对相同病例的评估结果,以确定该图谱按照我们的疾病分类方案对病例进行分类的实用性。
提出了以下五类共识分类:大疱性多形红斑,体表剥脱面积低于10%加上局部“典型靶形”或“隆起非典型靶形”;史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征,体表剥脱面积低于10%加上广泛的红斑或紫癜性斑疹或扁平非典型靶形;重叠性史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征-中毒性表皮坏死松解症,体表剥脱面积在10%至30%之间加上广泛的紫癜性斑疹或扁平非典型靶形;有斑片的中毒性表皮坏死松解症,体表剥脱面积高于30%加上广泛的紫癜性斑疹或扁平非典型靶形;无斑片的中毒性表皮坏死松解症,体表剥脱面积高于10%伴有大片表皮剥脱且无任何紫癜性斑疹或靶形。使用图谱时,非专家与专家的评估结果高度一致。
本研究表明图谱是一种有用的工具,可用于规范归因于药物或感染因素的急性重症大疱性疾病的诊断。所提出的五类是否代表不同的病因病理实体,还需要进一步的流行病学和实验室研究。