Finkelstein M S, Sherman N H, Rosenberg H K, Mahboubi S, Raney P B
Department of Medical Imaging, Alfred I. duPont Institute, Wilmington, DE 19899.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1993 Jan;93(1):75-82.
The authors retrospectively reviewed 15 cases of pelvic soft tissue sarcoma treated at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia during a recent 6-year period. These patients were treated before the availability of magnetic resonance imaging. The authors compared ultrasonography, computed tomography, and excretory urography/voiding cystourethrography for establishing the diagnosis and following the progression/regression of the disease. Results were correlated with clinical, surgical, and pathologic findings. Although computed tomography and ultrasonography were both capable of characterizing the size and texture of the lesion, computed tomography was superior in defining disease arising from the pelvic sidewall. Both techniques effectively identified residual mass at the tumor site, but neither could differentiate active tumor from inactive tumor, posttherapy inflammation, or fibrosis. Excretory urography/voiding cystourethrography provided no information that could not be gleaned from either ultrasonography or computed tomography.
作者回顾性分析了费城儿童医院在最近6年期间治疗的15例盆腔软组织肉瘤患者。这些患者在磁共振成像技术出现之前接受治疗。作者比较了超声、计算机断层扫描以及排泄性尿路造影/排尿性膀胱尿道造影在疾病诊断及随访病情进展/消退方面的作用。将结果与临床、手术及病理结果进行关联分析。尽管计算机断层扫描和超声均能够描述病变的大小和质地,但计算机断层扫描在确定起源于盆腔侧壁的疾病方面更具优势。两种技术均能有效识别肿瘤部位的残留肿块,但均无法区分活性肿瘤与非活性肿瘤、治疗后炎症或纤维化。排泄性尿路造影/排尿性膀胱尿道造影提供的信息均能从超声或计算机断层扫描中获取。