Moed B R, Thorderson P K
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48202-2689.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Feb;75(2):231-5.
An experimental model of acute compartment syndrome involving the anterolateral compartment of the hindlimb in dogs was used to compare three methods of measurement of intracompartmental pressure: the simple-needle technique, use of the slit catheter, and use of the side-ported needle. No statistical difference was found between the values obtained with the slit catheter and those obtained with the side-ported needle; the mean difference was 1.4 millimeters of mercury throughout the range of compartment pressures that were measured. The side-ported needle appeared to be as accurate as the slit catheter for the measurement of compartment pressures (p = 0.355, 1-beta = 0.9). The values obtained with use of the simple needle were consistently higher than those obtained with the other two methods (p < 0.001): an average of 18.3 millimeters of mercury higher than the values measured with the slit catheter and 19.3 millimeters of mercury higher than those measured with the side-ported needle. Clinically, the side-ported needle or the slit catheter can be used to obtain accurate measurements of compartment pressure. Use of the simple 18-gauge needle is not recommended for this purpose.
采用犬后肢前外侧间隔的急性间隔综合征实验模型,比较三种测量间隔内压力的方法:简易针技术、裂隙导管的使用和侧孔针的使用。裂隙导管测得的值与侧孔针测得的值之间未发现统计学差异;在整个测量的间隔压力范围内,平均差异为1.4毫米汞柱。对于间隔压力的测量,侧孔针似乎与裂隙导管一样准确(p = 0.355,1-β = 0.9)。使用简易针获得的值始终高于使用其他两种方法获得的值(p < 0.001):平均比裂隙导管测得的值高18.3毫米汞柱,比侧孔针测得的值高19.3毫米汞柱。临床上,侧孔针或裂隙导管可用于准确测量间隔压力。不建议为此目的使用简易的18号针。