• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种肌腱修复新方法:拉伸强度和间隙形成的体外评估

Two new methods of tendon repair: an in vitro evaluation of tensile strength and gap formation.

作者信息

Silfverskiöld K L, Andersson C H

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sahlgren Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 1993 Jan;18(1):58-65. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(93)90246-Y.

DOI:10.1016/0363-5023(93)90246-Y
PMID:8423320
Abstract

A new tendon repair design incorporating a mesh sleeve was, together with a new epitendinal suture technique (cross-stitch), tested biomechanically on sheep tendons. The mean breaking strength with a 6-0 suture was 103 N for the mesh sleeve repair and 63 N for the cross-stitch alone, both significantly greater than the 48 N recorded for the modified Kessler repair performed with a 4-0 polyester suture and reinforced with a circumferential conventional 6-0 epitendinal stitch. The cross-stitch grasp was 117% stronger than the conventional epitendinal grasp reinforced by a core stitch. The new techniques effectively prevented the large gaps that occurred in the modified Kessler repair.

摘要

一种采用网状套筒的新型肌腱修复设计,连同一种新的腱周缝合技术(十字缝合法),在羊肌腱上进行了生物力学测试。使用6-0缝线时,网状套筒修复的平均断裂强度为103 N,单纯十字缝合法为63 N,两者均显著高于使用4-0聚酯缝线并辅以传统6-0腱周缝合加强的改良凯斯勒修复术所记录的48 N。十字缝合法的抓持力比用核心缝线加强的传统腱周抓持力强117%。这些新技术有效防止了改良凯斯勒修复术中出现的大间隙。

相似文献

1
Two new methods of tendon repair: an in vitro evaluation of tensile strength and gap formation.两种肌腱修复新方法:拉伸强度和间隙形成的体外评估
J Hand Surg Am. 1993 Jan;18(1):58-65. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(93)90246-Y.
2
A new core suture technique for flexor tendon repair: biomechanical analysis of tensile strength and gap formation.一种用于屈指肌腱修复的新型核心缝合技术:拉伸强度和间隙形成的生物力学分析
J Hand Surg Br. 2000 Aug;25(4):390-2. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0384.
3
Comparison of a suture technique with the modified Kessler method: resistance to gap formation.一种缝合技术与改良凯斯勒方法的比较:抗间隙形成能力。
J Hand Surg Am. 1994 Sep;19(5):777-81. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90182-1.
4
Single side locking on the opposite of the modified Kessler tendon repair prevents gap formation and suture pull-out: a biomechanical evaluation in sheep tendons.改良Kessler肌腱修复术对侧的单边锁定可防止间隙形成和缝线拔出:绵羊肌腱的生物力学评估
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2009;20(2):102-6.
5
Contribution of a locking cross-stitch to a modified kessler core suture: a new technique.
Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Sep;59(3):297-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31802e8ae0.
6
The Oklahoma repair technique: a biomechanical study of a new suture repair technique.俄克拉荷马修复技术:一种新型缝合修复技术的生物力学研究
J Okla State Med Assoc. 2000 Dec;93(12):551-6.
7
Biomechanical analysis of the cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repair.十字形四股屈肌腱修复的生物力学分析
J Hand Surg Am. 1999 Mar;24(2):295-301. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.1999.0295.
8
Evaluation of a new 4-strand flexor tendon repair in a cadaveric porcine model.在猪尸体模型中对一种新型四股屈肌腱修复方法的评估。
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Jan;34(1):102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.09.007. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
9
[Tendon repair with the strengthened modified Kessler, modified Kessler, and Savage suture techniques: a biomechanical comparison].
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2007;41(3):238-43.
10
Influence of core suture purchase length on strength of four-strand tendon repairs.核心缝线置入长度对四股肌腱修复强度的影响。
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Jan;31(1):107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.09.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Different Immobilized Finger Positions After Repair of Flexor Tendon Rupture in Zones I and II: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial With Historical Control Group.I区和II区屈肌腱断裂修复术后不同固定手指位置的治疗效果比较:一项设有历史对照组的非随机对照试验
Cureus. 2024 Jun 12;16(6):e62218. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62218. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Assessing the application of barbed sutures in comparison to conventional sutures for surgical applications: a global systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical animal studies.评估医用缝合线在外科手术应用中的对比效果:全球系统评价和临床前动物研究的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):3060-3071. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001230.
3
Biomechanical effect of increased number of suture strands on rotator cuff repair in a bovine model.
牛模型中缝线股数增加对肩袖修复的生物力学影响。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2023 Oct 12;57(6):334-9. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2023.23042.
4
Running Interlocking Horizontal Mattress-A New Technique versus Modified Kessler in Extensor Tendon Injuries: A Comparative Study.连续交锁水平褥式缝合法——一种治疗伸肌腱损伤的新技术与改良凯斯勒缝合法的对比研究
J Hand Microsurg. 2021 Apr 13;15(1):59-66. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1727297. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Polymer-Based Constructs for Flexor Tendon Repair: A Review.用于屈肌腱修复的聚合物基构建体:综述
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;14(5):867. doi: 10.3390/polym14050867.
6
Effect of Oblique Tendon Laceration on Core Suture Strength: A Biomechanical Evaluation.斜肌腱撕裂对核心缝线强度的影响:一项生物力学评估。
Hand (N Y). 2022 Sep;17(5):853-859. doi: 10.1177/1558944720974115. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
7
Repair of flexor tendon injuries by four strands cruciate technique versus two strands kessler technique.四股十字技术与两股凯斯勒技术修复屈指肌腱损伤的比较
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jul-Aug;11(4):646-649. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.05.038. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
8
Flexor tendon injuries.屈肌腱损伤
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Sep-Oct;10(5):853-861. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
9
Improving Strength and Quality of Epitendinous Repairs.增强腱内修复的强度和质量。
Hand (N Y). 2020 Jul;15(4):495-501. doi: 10.1177/1558944718813608. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical versus non-surgical management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.手术与非手术治疗急性跟腱断裂的成本效益分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Oct;26(10):3074-3082. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4953-z. Epub 2018 Apr 25.