Grantham J R
Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.
Invest Radiol. 1993 Jan;28(1):99-101. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199301000-00034.
The author determined which criteria were important to program directors for selecting candidates for diagnostic radiology residency.
A questionnaire was sent to all radiology residency program directors. They were asked to rank 20 criteria they considered important in a written application. Miscellaneous questions about their program's selection process, including the interview, also were asked.
The overall response rate was 69%. Statistical analysis of responses showed significant differences between geographic regions and types of programs (university versus private hospital). Class rank and medical school grades were found to have the highest rating of importance. Nearly half of responding programs use a score sheet to evaluate the written application. On average, almost 60 candidates are invited to interview for approximately five available positions.
Criteria believed to be important for selection and the radiology resident selection process show significant differences among programs. These can be correlated partially with the location and type of program.
作者确定了哪些标准对放射诊断住院医师培训项目主任选拔住院医师候选人至关重要。
向所有放射科住院医师培训项目主任发送了一份问卷。要求他们对书面申请中他们认为重要的20项标准进行排序。还询问了有关其项目选拔过程的其他问题，包括面试。
总体回复率为69%。对回复的统计分析表明，不同地理区域和项目类型（大学与私立医院）之间存在显著差异。班级排名和医学院成绩被认为重要性最高。近一半的回复项目使用评分表来评估书面申请。平均而言，约60名候选人会被邀请参加面试，以竞争大约5个空缺职位。
各项目认为对选拔重要的标准以及放射科住院医师选拔过程存在显著差异。这些差异部分可与项目的地点和类型相关联。
