Patrick J
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Psychol. 1993 Jan;49(1):28-32. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199301)49:1<28::aid-jclp2270490105>3.0.co;2-6.
This study examined the MCMI-I BPD scale's accuracy in assigning borderline personality disorder as a primary diagnosis. Clinicians with particular expertise in Axis II pathology diagnosed borderline patients in two groups in this sample. Results indicate that the MCMI-I BPD scale has very limited utility as a screening instrument for individual diagnoses when a well-defined borderline sample is-used as a criterion. This study further suggests that at present only clinicians with particular expertise in the diagnosis of personality disorders can assess the degree and type of Axis II pathology present in a given patient. Because most structured interview and self-report validation studies have not included well-defined criterion groups, diagnostic validity of particular measures generally has not been established beyond the level of concordance.
本研究考察了MCMI-I边缘型人格障碍量表在将边缘型人格障碍作为主要诊断进行判定时的准确性。在该样本中,两组具有轴II病理学专门知识的临床医生对边缘型人格障碍患者进行了诊断。结果表明,当使用明确界定的边缘型人格障碍样本作为标准时,MCMI-I边缘型人格障碍量表作为个体诊断的筛查工具,其效用非常有限。本研究进一步表明,目前只有在人格障碍诊断方面具有专门知识的临床医生才能评估特定患者中存在的轴II病理学的程度和类型。由于大多数结构化访谈和自我报告验证研究未纳入明确界定的标准组,特定测量方法的诊断效度一般尚未超出一致性水平得以确立。