• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重程度作为边缘性人格障碍的一个诊断维度。

Severity as a diagnostic dimension of borderline personality disorder.

作者信息

Marziali E, Munroe-Blum H, Links P

机构信息

Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 1994 Nov;39(9):540-4. doi: 10.1177/070674379403900905.

DOI:10.1177/070674379403900905
PMID:7874655
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify diagnostic and severity subgroups within a cohort of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Of 171 patients clinically diagnosed with BPD, 132 were Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB) positive. Through a process of random selection, 41 of the DIB positive subjects were also interviewed with the revised version of the DIB (DIBR) and approximately one half with two semi-structured research interviews, the Schedule for Affective Disorders (SADS) and the Personality Disorder Examination (PDE). All subjects completed four self-report measures of problematic behaviours, symptoms and social adaptation. The analyses included examination of: 1. the correspondence of the BPD diagnosis across the DIB, the DIBR and the PDE; 2. the association between DIBR scoring levels and scores on measures of symptoms and behavioural status; and 3. the co-occurrence of BPD with Axis I and other Axis II disorders. Correlations and analyses of variance between both the DIB and DIBR scoring levels and the scores on the four symptom and behavioural measures showed that the scoring levels (DIB 7 to 10; DIBR 8 to 10) could be used to distinguish three subgroups of BPD. The three groups differed in terms of concordance for BPD with the PDE and in terms of patterns of overlap with DSM-III-R, Axis I and other Axis II disorders. This study shows that BPD subgroups can be located on a continuum of symptomatic and behavioural severity and that each subgroup has a specific pattern of overlap with Axis I and other Axis II disorders.

摘要

本研究的目的是在一组边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者中识别诊断和严重程度亚组。在171例临床诊断为BPD的患者中,132例边缘型人格障碍诊断访谈(DIB)呈阳性。通过随机选择的过程,41例DIB阳性受试者还接受了DIB修订版(DIBR)的访谈,约一半受试者接受了两项半结构化研究访谈,即情感障碍量表(SADS)和人格障碍检查(PDE)。所有受试者均完成了四项关于问题行为、症状和社会适应的自我报告测量。分析包括:1. DIB、DIBR和PDE之间BPD诊断的一致性;2. DIBR评分水平与症状和行为状态测量得分之间的关联;3. BPD与轴I及其他轴II障碍的共病情况。DIB和DIBR评分水平与四项症状和行为测量得分之间的相关性及方差分析表明,评分水平(DIB为7至10;DIBR为8至10)可用于区分BPD的三个亚组。这三组在BPD与PDE的一致性以及与DSM-III-R、轴I和其他轴II障碍的重叠模式方面存在差异。本研究表明,BPD亚组可位于症状和行为严重程度的连续体上,且每个亚组与轴I和其他轴II障碍都有特定的重叠模式。

相似文献

1
Severity as a diagnostic dimension of borderline personality disorder.严重程度作为边缘性人格障碍的一个诊断维度。
Can J Psychiatry. 1994 Nov;39(9):540-4. doi: 10.1177/070674379403900905.
2
A comparison of four measures to diagnose DSM-III-R borderline personality disorder in outpatients.门诊患者中用于诊断《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)边缘型人格障碍的四种测量方法的比较。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1991 Jun;179(6):329-37.
3
Structured interviews and borderline personality disorder.结构化访谈与边缘型人格障碍
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984 Jun;41(6):565-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790170039005.
4
[Symptoms of DSM IV borderline personality disorder in a nonclinical population of adolescents: study of a series of 35 patients].[非临床青少年人群中 DSM-IV 边缘型人格障碍的症状:对 35 例患者的系列研究]
Encephale. 2001 Mar-Apr;27(2):120-7.
5
Organization of co-occurring Axis II features in borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍中共存的轴II特征的组织形式
Br J Clin Psychol. 2008 Jun;47(Pt 2):185-200. doi: 10.1348/014466507X240731. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
6
[Validation of a Spanish version of the Diagnostic Interview for Bordelines-Revised (DIB-R)].[《边缘性诊断访谈修订版(DIB-R)》西班牙语版本的验证]
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2004 Sep-Oct;32(5):293-8.
7
Structured interviews for borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍的结构化访谈
Am J Psychiatry. 1990 Nov;147(11):1522-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.147.11.1522.
8
Heightened subjective experience of depression in borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍中抑郁的主观体验增强。
J Pers Disord. 2006 Aug;20(4):307-18. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2006.20.4.307.
9
The SCID-II and DIB-R interviews: diagnostic association with poor outcome risk factors in Borderline Personality Disorder.SCID-II 和 DIB-R 访谈:边缘型人格障碍诊断与预后不良风险因素的相关性。
Psicothema. 2012 Nov;24(4):523-8.
10
Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines-Revised.中文版《边缘性人格障碍诊断访谈修订版》的信效度研究
Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;6(3):326-33. doi: 10.1111/appy.12111. Epub 2013 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the Layers of Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review of Clinical Subtypes.揭示边缘型人格障碍的层次:临床亚型的系统综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 9;15(7):928. doi: 10.3390/bs15070928.