Marziali E, Munroe-Blum H, Links P
Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Ontario.
Can J Psychiatry. 1994 Nov;39(9):540-4. doi: 10.1177/070674379403900905.
The purpose of this study was to identify diagnostic and severity subgroups within a cohort of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Of 171 patients clinically diagnosed with BPD, 132 were Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB) positive. Through a process of random selection, 41 of the DIB positive subjects were also interviewed with the revised version of the DIB (DIBR) and approximately one half with two semi-structured research interviews, the Schedule for Affective Disorders (SADS) and the Personality Disorder Examination (PDE). All subjects completed four self-report measures of problematic behaviours, symptoms and social adaptation. The analyses included examination of: 1. the correspondence of the BPD diagnosis across the DIB, the DIBR and the PDE; 2. the association between DIBR scoring levels and scores on measures of symptoms and behavioural status; and 3. the co-occurrence of BPD with Axis I and other Axis II disorders. Correlations and analyses of variance between both the DIB and DIBR scoring levels and the scores on the four symptom and behavioural measures showed that the scoring levels (DIB 7 to 10; DIBR 8 to 10) could be used to distinguish three subgroups of BPD. The three groups differed in terms of concordance for BPD with the PDE and in terms of patterns of overlap with DSM-III-R, Axis I and other Axis II disorders. This study shows that BPD subgroups can be located on a continuum of symptomatic and behavioural severity and that each subgroup has a specific pattern of overlap with Axis I and other Axis II disorders.
本研究的目的是在一组边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者中识别诊断和严重程度亚组。在171例临床诊断为BPD的患者中,132例边缘型人格障碍诊断访谈(DIB)呈阳性。通过随机选择的过程,41例DIB阳性受试者还接受了DIB修订版(DIBR)的访谈,约一半受试者接受了两项半结构化研究访谈,即情感障碍量表(SADS)和人格障碍检查(PDE)。所有受试者均完成了四项关于问题行为、症状和社会适应的自我报告测量。分析包括:1. DIB、DIBR和PDE之间BPD诊断的一致性;2. DIBR评分水平与症状和行为状态测量得分之间的关联;3. BPD与轴I及其他轴II障碍的共病情况。DIB和DIBR评分水平与四项症状和行为测量得分之间的相关性及方差分析表明,评分水平(DIB为7至10;DIBR为8至10)可用于区分BPD的三个亚组。这三组在BPD与PDE的一致性以及与DSM-III-R、轴I和其他轴II障碍的重叠模式方面存在差异。本研究表明,BPD亚组可位于症状和行为严重程度的连续体上,且每个亚组与轴I和其他轴II障碍都有特定的重叠模式。