• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对治疗同意能力的测试。

Tests of competency to consent to treatment.

作者信息

Roth L H, Meisel A, Lidz C W

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1977 Mar;134(3):279-84. doi: 10.1176/ajp.134.3.279.

DOI:10.1176/ajp.134.3.279
PMID:842704
Abstract

The authors describe the various tests of competency to consent to treatment used today, which include the following: 1)evidencing a choice, 2)"reasonable" outcome of choice, 3)choice based on "rational" reasons, 4)ability to understand, and 5)actual understanding. They analyze the applicability of these tests to patients' decisions to accept or refuse psychiatric treatment and illustrate the problems of ap-lying these tests by citing clinical case examples. They find that the circumstances in which competency becomes an issue determine which elements of which tests are stressed and which are underplayed.

摘要

作者描述了当今用于判断治疗同意能力的各种测试,包括以下几点:1)表明有选择;2)选择的“合理”结果;3)基于“理性”理由的选择;4)理解能力;5)实际理解。他们分析了这些测试在患者接受或拒绝精神科治疗决策中的适用性,并通过引用临床案例来说明应用这些测试时存在的问题。他们发现,能力成为问题的具体情形决定了各项测试中哪些要素会得到强调,哪些会被忽视。

相似文献

1
Tests of competency to consent to treatment.对治疗同意能力的测试。
Am J Psychiatry. 1977 Mar;134(3):279-84. doi: 10.1176/ajp.134.3.279.
2
The dilemma of denial in the assessment of competency to refuse treatment.
Am J Psychiatry. 1982 Jul;139(7):910-3. doi: 10.1176/ajp.139.7.910.
3
Toward a model of the legal doctrine of informed consent.迈向知情同意法律原则的一种模式。
Am J Psychiatry. 1977 Mar;134(3):285-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.134.3.285.
4
Competency to consent.同意的能力。
North Carol Law Rev. 1991 Apr;69(4):945-99.
5
In re Guardianship of Ingram.关于英格拉姆的监护权案
Issues Law Med. 1985 Nov;1(3):243-6.
6
Competency to consent to research: a psychiatric overview.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982 Aug;39(8):951-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290080061009.
7
Implementing the PSDA for psychiatric patients: a common-sense approach.对精神病患者实施《患者自主决定法》:一种常识性方法。
J Clin Ethics. 1991 Fall;2(3):199-205.
8
Children's competence to provide informed consent for mental health treatment.儿童对心理健康治疗提供知情同意的能力。
Wash Lee Law Rev. 1993 Spring;50(2):695-753.
9
Shock therapy and informed consent.休克疗法与知情同意。
Ill Bar J. 1981 Jan;69(5):272-278, 287.
10
Public psychiatry and the right to refuse treatment: toward an effective damage remedy.公共精神病学与拒绝治疗的权利:寻求有效的损害补救措施。
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev. 1984 Winter;19(1):21-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Patient Knowledge Gaps Regarding the Purpose of Their Cardiometabolic Medications.患者对其心脏代谢药物用途的知识缺口患病率。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb 10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09407-8.
2
Ethics in Global Plastic Surgery Missions.全球整形外科研讨会中的伦理问题。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Oct 25;12(10):e6245. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006245. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Reliability of clinical judgment for evaluation of informed consent in mental health settings and the validation of the Evaluation of Informed Consent to Treatment (EICT) scale.
精神卫生环境中评估知情同意的临床判断可靠性及治疗知情同意评估(EICT)量表的效度验证
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 19;15:1309909. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1309909. eCollection 2024.
4
Capacity Assessments and the Assessment of Voluntariness in the Context of MAiD Legislation: The Role and Responsibility of Psychiatrists.《医疗协助死亡立法背景下的能力评估与自愿性评估:精神科医生的角色与责任》
Can J Psychiatry. 2024 Jul;69(7):536-557. doi: 10.1177/07067437231220458. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
5
Equality in the Informed Consent Process: Competence to Consent, Substitute Decision-Making, and Discrimination of Persons with Mental Disorders.知情同意过程中的平等:同意能力、替代决策制定以及精神障碍患者的歧视。
J Med Philos. 2021 Jan 25;46(1):108-136. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhaa030.
6
Decision-Making Capacity in Healthcare: Instruments Review and Reflections About its Assessment in the Elderly with Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.医疗保健中的决策能力:评估认知障碍和痴呆老年人的工具综述与思考。
Psychiatr Q. 2022 Mar;93(1):35-53. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09867-7. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
7
Decision-making capacity evaluations: the role of neuropsychological assessment from a multidisciplinary perspective.决策能力评估:多学科视角下的神经心理学评估作用。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01932-x.
8
Neuropsychological Predictors of Decision-Making Capacity in Terminally Ill Patients with Advanced Cancer.晚期癌症终末期患者决策能力的神经心理学预测因素
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Jan 24;35(1):1-9. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acz027.
9
Assessing the Decision-Making Capacity of Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer.评估癌症终末期患者的决策能力。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 May;26(5):523-531. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
10
Autonomy in Depressive Patients Undergoing DBS-Treatment: Informed Consent, Freedom of Will and DBS' Potential to Restore It.接受脑深部电刺激治疗的抑郁症患者的自主性:知情同意、意志自由以及脑深部电刺激恢复意志自由的潜力。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2017 Jun 8;11:11. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2017.00011. eCollection 2017.