Suppr超能文献

儿科创伤护理质量保证中的审核过滤器

Audit filters in quality assurance in pediatric trauma care.

作者信息

Nakayama D K, Gardner M J, Waggoner T

机构信息

Benedum Pediatric Trauma Program, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 1993 Jan;28(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(05)80347-1.

Abstract

Quality assurance (QA) systems use audit filters to help identify not only deaths and medical complications, but also cases that reflect deficiencies in the timeliness or appropriateness of care. Through our trauma center QA process, we studied three groups of audit screens for trauma care: two set forth by the Committee on Trauma of the American College of Surgeons, a minimum set of 12 audit filters proposed in 1987 and an expanded version recently proposed in 1990 (studied retrospectively), and one set of filters already in use in our system. A peer review committee determined whether deaths and complication were preventable, and judged the timeliness and appropriateness of care. From July 1, 1989, through June 30, 1990, 844 admitted trauma patients came under QA review. During this period 13 (1.5%) died; 35 (4.1%) suffered at least one medical complication. 140 children (16.6%) violated one of the 12 minimum audit filters suggested by the Committee on Trauma (which includes deaths and medical complications), one of the additional filters used by the Trauma Program QA system, or both. Ninety patients (10.6%) failed one of the 12 minimum audit filters; 104 (12.3%) failed one of the additional filters used by the Trauma Program QA system. Filters that involved medical management issues (late operations, return to operating room, airway, failed reduction, infections, missed injuries, readmissions to intensive care unit, return to the emergency department) frequently involved aspects of inappropriate care (72.5%, 37/51 violations) and were associated with actual deaths or medical complications (52.9%, 27/51).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

质量保证(QA)系统使用审核筛选器,不仅有助于识别死亡病例和医疗并发症,还能识别反映护理及时性或适当性不足的病例。通过我们创伤中心的质量保证流程,我们研究了三组创伤护理审核筛选标准:美国外科医师学会创伤委员会提出的两组标准,一组是1987年提出的至少12个审核筛选器(回顾性研究),另一组是最近于1990年提出的扩展版本,以及我们系统中已在使用的一组筛选标准。一个同行评审委员会确定死亡和并发症是否可预防,并评判护理的及时性和适当性。从1989年7月1日至1990年6月30日,844名入院的创伤患者接受了质量保证审查。在此期间,13人(1.5%)死亡;35人(4.1%)至少出现一种医疗并发症。140名儿童(16.6%)违反了创伤委员会建议的12项最低审核筛选标准中的一项(包括死亡和医疗并发症)、创伤项目质量保证系统使用的额外筛选标准中的一项或两项。90名患者(10.6%)未通过12项最低审核筛选标准中的一项;104名患者(12.3%)未通过创伤项目质量保证系统使用的额外筛选标准中的一项。涉及医疗管理问题的筛选标准(延迟手术、返回手术室、气道、复位失败`、感染、漏诊损伤、再次入住重症监护病房、返回急诊科)经常涉及不适当护理的方面(72.5%,51项违规中的37项),并与实际死亡或医疗并发症相关(52.9%,51项中的27项)。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验