Orr H A
Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis 95616.
Nature. 1993 Feb 11;361(6412):532-3. doi: 10.1038/361532a0.
Haldane's rule states that "When in the F1 offspring of two different animal races one sex is absent, rare, or sterile, that sex is the heterozygous [heterogametic or XY] sex". This rule represents one of the few patterns characterizing animal speciation. Traditional explanations of Haldane's rule claim that heterogametic hybrids are unfit because they lack an X chromosome that is 'compatible' with the autosomes of one species. Recent work shows that this explanation is incorrect for hybrid sterility: contrary to prediction, homogametic hybrids carrying both X chromosomes from the same species remain fertile. Until now, similar tests have not been performed for hybrid inviability. Here I show that homogametic hybrids who carry both X chromosomes from the same species are inviable. These results show tht the genetic causes of Haldane's rule differ for hybrid sterility versus inviability. Haldane's rule does not, therefore, have a single genetic basis.
“在两个不同动物种族的F1代后代中,若一种性别缺失、稀少或不育,那么该性别就是杂合的[异配或XY]性别”。这一法则是少数表征动物物种形成的模式之一。对霍尔丹法则的传统解释称,异配杂种不适应是因为它们缺少一条与某一物种常染色体“兼容”的X染色体。近期研究表明,这种解释对于杂种不育来说是不正确的:与预测相反,携带来自同一物种两条X染色体的同配杂种仍然可育。到目前为止,尚未针对杂种 inviability进行类似的测试。在此我表明,携带来自同一物种两条X染色体的同配杂种是 inviable的。这些结果表明,霍尔丹法则在杂种不育与inviability方面的遗传原因有所不同。因此,霍尔丹法则没有单一的遗传基础。 (注:原文中inviability未给出准确中文释义,暂保留英文)