• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

附件肿物:经阴道超声与盆腔磁共振成像特异性的比较

Adnexal masses: comparison of specificity of endovaginal US and pelvic MR imaging.

作者信息

Jain K A, Friedman D L, Pettinger T W, Alagappan R, Jeffrey R B, Sommer F G

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento 95817.

出版信息

Radiology. 1993 Mar;186(3):697-704. doi: 10.1148/radiology.186.3.8430177.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.186.3.8430177
PMID:8430177
Abstract

In a prospective study, 32 women with suspected pelvic masses at physical examination underwent both endovaginal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to compare their ability in diagnosis of adnexal masses. Criteria for the diagnosis of various types of adnexal masses with MR imaging and endovaginal US were prospectively defined, and the ability of either modality to allow a specific diagnosis was assessed. For each modality, measures of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were obtained. Results indicated higher diagnostic capability of endovaginal US for simple cysts (five of five), hemorrhagic cysts (eight of nine), endometriomas (nine of 14), and ovarian carcinomas (three of three). MR imaging demonstrated higher diagnostic capability for dermoids (three of three). MR imaging and endovaginal US showed equal diagnostic capability for pedunculated fibroids (two of two). For all masses, observers, and observations, the overall sensitivity of endovaginal US was 76% versus 49% for MR imaging, and the overall accuracy of endovaginal US was 83% versus 70% for MR imaging. The authors suggest that endovaginal US is a better modality than MR imaging for the assessment of suspected pelvic masses.

摘要

在一项前瞻性研究中,32名在体格检查时怀疑有盆腔肿块的女性接受了经阴道超声(US)和磁共振(MR)成像检查,以比较它们对附件肿块的诊断能力。前瞻性地定义了用MR成像和经阴道超声诊断各种类型附件肿块的标准,并评估了两种检查方法进行特异性诊断的能力。对于每种检查方法,均获得了敏感性、特异性和准确性的测量值。结果表明,经阴道超声对单纯囊肿(5例中的5例)、出血性囊肿(9例中的8例)、子宫内膜瘤(14例中的9例)和卵巢癌(3例中的3例)具有更高的诊断能力。MR成像对皮样囊肿(3例中的3例)显示出更高的诊断能力。MR成像和经阴道超声对带蒂肌瘤(2例中的2例)显示出相同的诊断能力。对于所有肿块、观察者和观察结果,经阴道超声的总体敏感性为76%,而MR成像为49%;经阴道超声的总体准确性为83%,而MR成像为70%。作者认为,对于疑似盆腔肿块的评估,经阴道超声是比MR成像更好的检查方法。

相似文献

1
Adnexal masses: comparison of specificity of endovaginal US and pelvic MR imaging.附件肿物:经阴道超声与盆腔磁共振成像特异性的比较
Radiology. 1993 Mar;186(3):697-704. doi: 10.1148/radiology.186.3.8430177.
2
Prospective evaluation of adnexal masses with endovaginal gray-scale and duplex and color Doppler US: correlation with pathologic findings.经阴道灰阶、双功及彩色多普勒超声对附件包块的前瞻性评估:与病理结果的相关性
Radiology. 1994 Apr;191(1):63-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134599.
3
Evaluation of pelvic masses with magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography.磁共振成像和超声检查对盆腔肿块的评估
J Ultrasound Med. 1994 Nov;13(11):845-53. doi: 10.7863/jum.1994.13.11.845.
4
Adnexal masses: transvaginal US and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging assessment of intratumoral structure.附件肿物:经阴道超声及钆增强磁共振成像对瘤内结构的评估
Radiology. 1996 Jan;198(1):109-15. doi: 10.1148/radiology.198.1.8539360.
5
Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging.附件肿物:经阴道超声及对比剂增强前后磁共振成像特征描述的准确性
Radiology. 1995 Feb;194(2):557-65. doi: 10.1148/radiology.194.2.7824738.
6
Adnexal masses: MR imaging observations at 1.5 T, with US and CT correlation.附件肿物:1.5T磁共振成像观察结果,与超声和CT的相关性
Radiology. 1987 Feb;162(2):319-24. doi: 10.1148/radiology.162.2.3541026.
7
MR imaging evaluation of postmenopausal adnexal masses: correlation with final pathologic diagnosis.绝经后附件包块的磁共振成像评估:与最终病理诊断的相关性
Maturitas. 2006 Jan 10;53(1):27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.02.003.
8
Comparison of Doppler with two-dimensional sonography and CA 125 for prediction of malignancy of pelvic masses.多普勒超声与二维超声及CA 125在预测盆腔肿块恶性肿瘤方面的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun;81(6):983-8.
9
Imaging techniques for the pre-surgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours.附件肿瘤术前诊断的影像学技术。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Jul;28(5):683-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
10
Correlation of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis with pathology for indeterminate adnexal masses.盆腔磁共振成像诊断与不确定附件包块病理结果的相关性
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Sep;24(7):1215-21. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000203.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses: A meta-analysis.经阴道超声检查对附件包块进行特定诊断的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Dec;20(6):265. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9395. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
2
Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.子宫内膜异位症非侵入性诊断的成像方式
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 26;2(2):CD009591. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009591.pub2.
3
Added Value of Assessing Adnexal Masses with Advanced MRI Techniques.
采用先进磁共振成像技术评估附件包块的附加价值
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:785206. doi: 10.1155/2015/785206. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
4
Management of a suspicious adnexal mass: a clinical practice guideline.附件肿物可疑患者的处理:临床实践指南。
Curr Oncol. 2012 Aug;19(4):e244-57. doi: 10.3747/co.19.980.
5
Positron emission tomography in ovarian cancer: 18F-deoxy-glucose and 16alpha-18F-fluoro-17beta-estradiol PET.正电子发射断层扫描在卵巢癌中的应用:18F-脱氧葡萄糖和 16α-18F-氟-17β-雌二醇 PET。
J Ovarian Res. 2009 Jun 16;2(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1757-2215-2-7.
6
Radiology rounds. Ovarian cystic teratoma (ovarian dermoid).放射科会诊。卵巢囊性畸胎瘤(卵巢皮样囊肿)。
Can Fam Physician. 1994 Oct;40:1717, 1721-4.