Suppr超能文献

[上层建筑还是基础?论元心理学及元心理学辩论]

[Superstructure or foundation? On metapsychology and the metapsychology debate].

作者信息

Schmidt-Hellerau C

机构信息

Psychologischen Instituts der Universität Zürich.

出版信息

Psyche (Stuttg). 1993 Jan;47(1):1-30.

PMID:8430229
Abstract

In the sixties and seventies the value (or otherwise) of Freud's metapsychology was the subject of animated discussion. Today the subject seems to have lost its power to excite controversy. The author reconstructs the criticism of metapsychology and shows that the problems posed by the "witch" metapsychology can by no means be regarded as shelved. If we locate metapsychology in the boundary area between psychic and somatic and regard it as an attempt to conceptualise the unity of body and mind/soul, then the author feels it necessary to hold on to metapsychology as a crucial source of psychoanalytic knowledge. Further, she calls for a research programme with a historical perspective to establish an archeology of the argumentative structures underlying metapsychological discourse since Freud.

摘要

在六七十年代,弗洛伊德元心理学的价值(或其他方面)是激烈讨论的主题。如今,这个主题似乎已失去引发争议的能力。作者重构了对元心理学的批评,并表明“巫术”元心理学所提出的问题绝不能被视为已搁置。如果我们将元心理学置于心理与躯体的边界领域,并将其视为对身心/灵魂统一进行概念化的一种尝试,那么作者认为有必要将元心理学作为精神分析知识的关键来源予以保留。此外,她呼吁开展一项具有历史视角的研究计划,以建立自弗洛伊德以来元心理学话语背后论证结构的考古学。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验