Comparison of the electrophysiologic effects of oral sustained-release and intravenous verapamil in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.

The electrophysiologic effects of intravenous verapamil (0.15 mg/kg) and oral sustained-release verapamil (verapamil-SR) (240 mg once daily for 7 days) were studied in 17 patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Ten patients had atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia and 7 had AV reciprocating tachycardia involving an accessory AV pathway. Both preparations significantly prolonged anterograde effective refractory period of the AV node and depressed the retrograde AV nodal conduction system. The sinus cycle length, and atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods were prolonged after oral verapamil-SR. Furthermore, oral verapamil-SR depressed retrograde accessory pathway conduction which was not interfered with by intravenous verapamil. Intravenous verapamil and oral verapamil-SR prevented induction of sustained SVT in 12 of 17 (71%) and 10 of 17 (59%) patients, respectively. Follow-up study with oral verapamil-SR 240 mg once daily in 15 patients for 19 +/- 6 months revealed that among the 8 patients without induction of sustained SVT, 7 have been free of symptomatic arrhythmia; only 1 patient had occasional SVT attacks. For the 7 patients with induction of sustained SVT, 3 patients failed to respond to oral verapamil-SR, 1 patient became symptom free, and the remaining 3 patients had less frequent SVT attacks. Thus, immediate intravenous verapamil testing predicts the electrophysiologic results of oral verapamil-SR therapy, and oral verapamil-SR once daily may be used for long-term prophylaxis of SVT with better patient compliance.