Garcia Ruiz A J, Zambelli M, La Porta C, Ladinsky H, Consolo S
Laboratory of Cholinergic Neuropharmacology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy.
Eur J Pharmacol. 1993 Jan 15;244(2):125-31. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(93)90017-4.
Carbachol, a full muscarinic receptor agonist, stimulated [3H]inositol phosphate accumulation in both the ventral and dorsal hippocampus, but its efficacy and affinity were higher in the former area. The partial agonist oxotremorine had a weak stimulatory effect in both regions. The affinity profiles of pirenzepine and AF-DX 116 in antagonizing carbachol-stimulated [3H]inositol phosphate accumulation indicated that M1 and M3 receptors contributed equally to the response in either region. On the other hand, there were no differences in the receptor density, or in the distribution of muscarinic receptor subtypes between the two regions of the hippocampus which could account for the effect as determined in binding experiments with selective antagonists. Analysis of carbachol binding curves did, instead, indicate a difference in the way the agonist interacted with the receptors within the hippocampus, i.e., carbachol recognized three agonist affinity states (superhigh, high and low) in the ventral hippocampus, and only two (high and low) in the dorsal part. The findings thus suggested that the regional diversity in the efficacy of carbachol in stimulating phosphoinositide turnover was related to the complexity with which it bound to muscarinic receptors. Transduction processes that intervene between changes in the muscarinic receptors' conformation and activation of phospholipase C might be relevant to these differences.
卡巴胆碱是一种完全的毒蕈碱受体激动剂,可刺激腹侧和背侧海马体中[3H]肌醇磷酸的积累,但其在前一区域的效力和亲和力更高。部分激动剂氧化震颤素在两个区域均具有较弱的刺激作用。哌仑西平和AF-DX 116拮抗卡巴胆碱刺激的[3H]肌醇磷酸积累的亲和力曲线表明,M1和M3受体对任一区域的反应贡献相同。另一方面,海马体两个区域之间的受体密度或毒蕈碱受体亚型的分布没有差异,这可以解释在与选择性拮抗剂结合实验中所确定的效应。相反,对卡巴胆碱结合曲线的分析表明,激动剂与海马体内受体相互作用的方式存在差异,即卡巴胆碱在腹侧海马体中识别三种激动剂亲和力状态(超高、高和低),而在背侧部分仅识别两种(高和低)。因此,这些发现表明,卡巴胆碱刺激磷酸肌醇周转效力的区域差异与其与毒蕈碱受体结合的复杂性有关。介于毒蕈碱受体构象变化和磷脂酶C激活之间的转导过程可能与这些差异有关。