Heaton N D, Howard E R
Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital, London.
Gut. 1993 Jan;34(1):7-10. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.1.7.
Injection sclerotherapy is now the accepted first line treatment for bleeding oesophageal varices, although it is associated with an impressive list of rare complications. The main problem concerns the strategy for uncontrollable or recurrent bleeding. Patients with uncontrolled bleeding may be referred for surgery after considerable blood loss and are then extremely difficult to assess. The effects of blood loss on liver function can lead to an unduly pessimistic assessment of liver status. An effective choice of emergency surgical procedure may require considerable surgical expertise. Oesophageal transection and devascularisation are satisfactory for many patients with oesophageal varices secondary to cirrhosis and should nearly always control bleeding. Difficulties arise in patients who are grossly obese and in those who have undergone extensive surgery in the upper abdomen. Problems may also be encountered in those treated by repeated sclerotherapy, which may have caused severe inflammatory change and thickening around the lower oesophagus and upper stomach. We believe that an emergency mesocaval shunt using either a vein graft or a synthetic material such as polytetrafluoroethylene is the procedure of choice for this difficult group of very sick patients. The surgical exposure is satisfactory and not unduly prolonged in even the largest patients and the technique does not interfere with any subsequent transplant operation. There is a greater choice in the management of the patient with less urgent bleeding from recurrent varices after sclerotherapy. Repeat sclerotherapy may be effective for small oesophageal varices while liver transplantation may be indicated in the patient with deteriorating liver function. A selective distal splenorenal shunt should be considered for patients with intact splenic and left renal veins and a mesocaval vein graft for the remainder. We would therefore suggest that surgery should still be considered for the management of portal hypertension, particularly in the following circumstances: (1) Uncontrollable bleeding during the initial course of sclerotherapy; (2) Life threatening haemorrhage from recurrent varices; (3) Bleeding from ectopic varices not accessible to sclerotherapy; (4) Uncontrollable bleeding from oesophageal ulceration secondary to injection sclerotherapy; (5) Severe, symptomatic hypersplenism; (6) For patients who live in communities remote from blood transfusion facilities and adequate medical care. The management of the complications of portal hypertension continues to pose problems. We believe that the best results should come from a combined management approach using injection sclerotherapy as primary treatment and surgery for complications and for haemorrhage from unusual anatomical sites.
注射硬化疗法目前是公认的食管静脉曲张出血的一线治疗方法,尽管它伴有一系列令人瞩目的罕见并发症。主要问题涉及难以控制或复发性出血的治疗策略。出血难以控制的患者在大量失血后可能会被转诊进行手术,而此时对其进行评估极为困难。失血对肝功能的影响可能导致对肝脏状况的评估过度悲观。选择有效的急诊手术方式可能需要相当丰富的手术专业知识。对于许多肝硬化继发食管静脉曲张的患者,食管横断术和去血管化术效果良好,几乎总能控制出血。对于极度肥胖的患者以及上腹部接受过广泛手术的患者,手术会遇到困难。在接受反复硬化治疗的患者中也可能出现问题,反复硬化治疗可能导致食管下段和胃上部周围出现严重的炎症改变和增厚。我们认为,对于这组病情严重的困难患者,采用静脉移植物或聚四氟乙烯等合成材料进行急诊肠系膜上腔静脉分流术是首选的手术方式。即使是体型最大的患者,手术暴露也令人满意,且手术时间不会过长,该技术不会干扰随后的任何移植手术。对于硬化治疗后复发性静脉曲张出血不太紧急的患者,治疗选择更多。重复硬化治疗可能对小的食管静脉曲张有效,而肝功能恶化的患者可能需要进行肝移植。对于脾静脉和左肾静脉完整的患者,应考虑选择性远端脾肾分流术,其余患者则考虑肠系膜上腔静脉移植物。因此,我们建议对于门静脉高压的治疗仍应考虑手术,特别是在以下情况下:(1)硬化治疗初始过程中出血难以控制;(2)复发性静脉曲张危及生命的出血;(3)硬化治疗无法触及的异位静脉曲张出血;(4)注射硬化治疗继发食管溃疡导致的难以控制的出血;(5)严重的、有症状的脾功能亢进;(6)对于居住在远离输血设施和充分医疗护理社区的患者。门静脉高压并发症的治疗仍然存在问题。我们认为,最佳结果应来自综合治疗方法,以注射硬化疗法作为主要治疗手段,针对并发症以及特殊解剖部位的出血进行手术治疗。