Suppr超能文献

门体分流术或内镜硬化治疗后门静脉系统:多普勒超声评估

Portal venous system after portosystemic shunts or endoscopic sclerotherapy: evaluation with Doppler sonography.

作者信息

Rice S, Lee K P, Johnson M B, Korula J, Ralls P W

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Jan;156(1):85-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.156.1.1898575.

Abstract

We sought to determine the usefulness of duplex Doppler sonography in the assessment of blood flow and clot formation in the portal vein in 44 patients with portal hypertension and bleeding esophageal varices who had undergone either endoscopic sclerotherapy (28 cases) or portosystemic shunt procedures (16 cases). The main, left, and right portal veins (collectively referred to as intrahepatic portal veins), superior mesenteric vein, splenic vein, and shunt were assessed for flow direction, presence of thrombi, and collaterals. Patent shunts were visualized in 12 (75%) of the 16 cases. Clot was detected in 27 (69%) of 39 intrahepatic portal veins in patients with end-to-side shunts, in six (67%) of nine intrahepatic portal veins in patients with distal splenorenal shunts, and in five (5%) of 92 intrahepatic portal veins in patients who had had endoscopic sclerotherapy. Flow in the main portal vein was hepatopetal in two (15%) of 13 patients with patent shunts (one end-to-side portacaval shunt and one distal splenorenal shunt). Flow in the main portal vein was hepatopetal in 26 (93%) of 28 patients who had had endoscopic sclerotherapy. Our data suggest endoscopic sclerotherapy preserves antegrade portal flow and results in fewer portal vein clots than surgical portosystemic shunts do. Patterns of thrombosis and flow direction vary unpredictably from patient to patient. Shunt patency should not be inferred without direct visualization of the shunt.

摘要

我们试图确定双功多普勒超声检查在评估44例门静脉高压和食管静脉曲张出血患者的门静脉血流及血栓形成方面的作用,这些患者均接受了内镜硬化治疗(28例)或门体分流术(16例)。对门静脉主干、左支、右支(统称为肝内门静脉)、肠系膜上静脉、脾静脉及分流血管进行血流方向、血栓存在情况及侧支循环的评估。16例患者中有12例(75%)可见通畅的分流血管。在接受端侧分流术的患者中,39条肝内门静脉中有27条(69%)检测到血栓;在接受远端脾肾分流术的患者中,9条肝内门静脉中有6条(67%)检测到血栓;而在接受内镜硬化治疗的患者中,92条肝内门静脉中有5条(5%)检测到血栓。在13例分流血管通畅的患者中,有2例(15%)门静脉主干血流为向肝血流(1例端侧门腔分流术和1例远端脾肾分流术)。在28例接受内镜硬化治疗的患者中,有26例(93%)门静脉主干血流为向肝血流。我们的数据表明,与外科门体分流术相比,内镜硬化治疗可保留门静脉正向血流,且门静脉血栓形成较少。不同患者之间血栓形成模式和血流方向变化不可预测。若未直接观察到分流血管,则不应推断分流血管通畅。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验