Cioffi D, Holloway J
Department of Psychology, University of Houston.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Feb;64(2):274-82. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.64.2.274.
The study demonstrates that the rebound effect of thought suppression (Wegner, 1989) has an analog in the experience of somatic discomfort. During a cold-pressor pain induction, 63 Ss were instructed either to concentrate on their room at home (distraction), to pay close attention to their hand sensations (monitoring), or to remove awareness of those sensations from mind (suppression). Two min of postpressor pain ratings showed that monitoring produced the most rapid recovery from the pain and that suppression produced the slowest. Suppression also contaminated the interpretation of a subsequent somatic stimulation; later in the experimental hour, Ss who had suppressed their cold-pressor discomfort rated an innocuous vibration as more unpleasant than did other Ss. The strategies are discussed for their necessarily distinct processes of goal evaluation and their possibly differential drain on perceived coping capacities.
该研究表明,思维抑制的反弹效应(韦格纳,1989年)在躯体不适体验中存在类似情况。在冷加压疼痛诱导过程中,63名受试者被指示要么专注于家中的房间(分散注意力),密切关注手部感觉(监测),要么从脑海中消除对这些感觉的意识(抑制)。两分钟的加压后疼痛评分显示,监测组从疼痛中恢复得最快,而抑制组恢复得最慢。抑制还影响了对随后躯体刺激的解读;在实验过程的后期,抑制了冷加压不适的受试者比其他受试者将无害的振动评价为更不愉快。文中讨论了这些策略在目标评估过程上必然存在的差异,以及它们对感知应对能力可能产生的不同消耗。