Narimatsu E
Department of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical College.
Masui. 1993 Jan;42(1):25-36.
It has been reported clinically that edrophonium (EDR) has a more potent antagonistic effect on the fade of twitch tension and a less potent antagonistic effect on the depressed single twitch force induced by muscle relaxants than does neostigmine (NST). However, the details of the mechanism have not yet been clarified. In this experiment, to compare the antagonistic effect of EDR and NST on the neuromuscular blocking effect of dTc, the recovery from dTc induced neuromuscular blocking effect on both the postjunctional membrane and the motor nerve terminal with EDR or NST was studied using intracellular recording techniques in rat phrenic nerve-hemidiaphragm preparations. The preparation was constantly perfused with physiological saline solution at room temperature. To determine the ACh sensitivity of the postjunctional membrane, ACh potentials were elicited and recorded. To determine the quantum release of ACh from the motor nerve terminal and its rundown, endplate potentials (EPPs) were elicited at 2Hz and recorded. ACh sensitivity was increased with EDR and NST in a dose dependent manner. The extent of increased ACh sensitivity with EDR 10(-6)M was almost equal to that with NST 10(-7)M. In this experiment, these concentrations were used to compare the antagonistic effect of EDR and NST on the effect of dTc 10(-6)M. The depressed ACh sensitivity with dTc was reversed with EDR and NST. The extent of restoration with NST was about three times that with EDR. The quantum release of ACh was increased and rundown was depressed with EDR, but NST had no effect. After pretreatment with dTc, neither EDR nor NST increased the decreased quantum release of ACh nor reversed the enhanced rundown induced by dTc. But under the same condition, both EDR and NST reversed the ACh sensitivity depressed with dTc. These results demonstrate that neither EDR nor NST were able to affect the decreased quantum release of ACh nor the enhanced rundown induced by dTc. The results also suggest that the reversal of fade of twitch tension with EDR and NST does not always result from recovery of rundown of EPP amplitude.
临床报告显示,依酚氯铵(EDR)对肌肉松弛剂所致的颤搐张力衰减具有更强的拮抗作用,而对肌肉松弛剂所致的单颤搐力抑制作用的拮抗效果则弱于新斯的明(NST)。然而,其作用机制的细节尚未阐明。在本实验中,为比较EDR和NST对筒箭毒碱(dTc)神经肌肉阻滞作用的拮抗效果,采用细胞内记录技术,在大鼠膈神经-半膈肌标本中研究了EDR或NST对dTc所致神经肌肉阻滞作用在接头后膜和运动神经末梢的恢复情况。标本在室温下持续用生理盐溶液灌注。为测定接头后膜对乙酰胆碱(ACh)的敏感性,引发并记录ACh电位。为测定运动神经末梢ACh的量子释放及其消耗情况,以2Hz频率引发终板电位(EPPs)并记录。EDR和NST均可使ACh敏感性呈剂量依赖性增加。10⁻⁶M的EDR使ACh敏感性增加的程度与10⁻⁷M的NST几乎相同。在本实验中,使用这些浓度来比较EDR和NST对10⁻⁶M dTc作用的拮抗效果。dTc所致的ACh敏感性降低可被EDR和NST逆转。NST的恢复程度约为EDR的三倍。EDR可增加ACh的量子释放并抑制其消耗,但NST无此作用。用dTc预处理后,EDR和NST均未增加dTc所致的ACh量子释放减少,也未逆转dTc所致的消耗增强。但在相同条件下,EDR和NST均可逆转dTc所致的ACh敏感性降低。这些结果表明,EDR和NST均无法影响dTc所致的ACh量子释放减少及消耗增强。结果还提示,EDR和NST对颤搐张力衰减的逆转并不总是源于EPP幅度消耗的恢复。