Ito T, Nishino M, Nakagawa T, Okada T, Hasegawa S, Kuryu T, Ebisuno S, Ohnishi S, Tanahashi H, Yasuno M
Division of Cardiology, Osaka Rosai Hospital.
Kokyu To Junkan. 1993 Jan;41(1):63-7.
In this study of 10 patients with sick sinus syndrome, we examined the benefits of a single-chamber ventricular pacing system that utilizes a sensor to detect the QT interval and then adjusts the heart rate. Changes in exercise tolerance capacity and cardiac function were evaluated when the pacing mode was changed from rate-variable mode (VVIR) to fixed-rate mode (VVI). Anaerobic threshold (AT), peak VO2 and cardiac output were measured in VVIR, during short-term VVI(VVI-S), which occurred two hours after the pacing mode was changed, and during long-term VVI (VVI-L), which occurred one month after the pacing mode was changed. 8 of 10 cases (80%) had their own beats during exercise. The AT and peak VO2 during VVI-S were not different from those during VVIR. However, AT and peak VO2 during VVI-L were significantly lower than those during VVIR pacing. (Respectively, 11.7 +/- 2.4 vs. 16.4 +/- 3.3, p < 0.01; 21.5 +/- 5.9 vs. 24.6 +/- 6.2, p < 0.01). At AT and peak VO2, there were no differences in cardiac output between VVIR and VVI-S, or between VVIR and VVI-L(NS). Physiologic changes in heart rate and cardiac output after exercise during VVIR were greater than those during VVI pacing. The present study suggests the above-mentioned changes after exercise effect, oxygen consumption in the peripheral circulation, which might lower exercise tolerance capacity in the chronic phase. The rate-variable pacing mode might improve exercise tolerance capacity and may be of benefit for patients with sick sinus syndrome.
在这项针对10例病态窦房结综合征患者的研究中,我们检验了一种单腔心室起搏系统的益处,该系统利用传感器检测QT间期,然后调整心率。当起搏模式从频率可变模式(VVIR)改为固定频率模式(VVI)时,评估运动耐量和心功能的变化。在VVIR模式下、起搏模式改变两小时后的短期VVI(VVI-S)期间以及起搏模式改变一个月后的长期VVI(VVI-L)期间,测量无氧阈值(AT)、峰值摄氧量(peak VO2)和心输出量。10例患者中有8例(80%)在运动时有自身心跳。VVI-S期间的AT和peak VO2与VVIR期间无差异。然而,VVI-L期间的AT和peak VO2显著低于VVIR起搏期间。(分别为11.7±2.4对16.4±3.3,p<0.01;21.5±5.9对24.6±6.2,p<0.01)。在AT和peak VO2时,VVIR与VVI-S之间或VVIR与VVI-L之间的心输出量无差异(无统计学意义)。VVIR期间运动后心率和心输出量的生理变化大于VVI起搏期间。本研究提示上述运动后的变化影响外周循环中的氧消耗,这可能会降低慢性期的运动耐量。频率可变起搏模式可能会提高运动耐量,对病态窦房结综合征患者可能有益。