• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[眼外伤的统计研究——安全带立法对交通性眼外伤的影响]

[Statistical study of ocular injuries--effect of the seat belt legislation in traffic ocular injuries].

作者信息

Yamamoto M, Uchio E, Kohno T, Inomata H

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1993 Jan;97(1):122-6.

PMID:8434531
Abstract

Three hundred and eighty cases of eye injuries treated at Kyushu University Hospital during from January, 1984 to December, 1989 were statistically analyzed. Ocular injuries comprised about 10% of the total number of in-patient cases. Males were five times more than females. Among the age groups, those in their teens were the most affected. The most frequent cause of injuries was blunt trauma in sports. The effect of the seat belt legislation in November 1986 in traffic ocular injuries was examined. Traffic ocular injury cases were about 20% of all cases of ocular injuries. In the ocular injury, perforating injury was the most among traffic eye injuries and the visual outcome was poor. However, after the seat belt legislation the rate of traffic ocular injuries in total ocular eye injuries decreased from 26% to 14%. Furthermore, the incidence of perforating eye injuries caused by shattering windshields decreased significantly and the final visual acuity was better than before legislation. From these results, we conclude that the seat belt legislation has been effective in decreasing traffic eye injuries.

摘要

对1984年1月至1989年12月期间在九州大学医院接受治疗的380例眼外伤病例进行了统计分析。眼外伤约占住院病例总数的10%。男性患者是女性患者的五倍。在各年龄组中,十几岁的人群受影响最大。最常见的受伤原因是运动中的钝器伤。研究了1986年11月安全带立法对交通性眼外伤的影响。交通性眼外伤病例约占所有眼外伤病例的20%。在眼外伤中,穿通伤在交通性眼外伤中最为常见,视力预后较差。然而,安全带立法实施后,交通性眼外伤在总眼外伤中的比例从26%降至14%。此外,因挡风玻璃破碎导致的穿通性眼外伤发生率显著下降,最终视力比立法前更好。从这些结果来看,我们得出结论,安全带立法在减少交通性眼外伤方面是有效的。

相似文献

1
[Statistical study of ocular injuries--effect of the seat belt legislation in traffic ocular injuries].[眼外伤的统计研究——安全带立法对交通性眼外伤的影响]
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1993 Jan;97(1):122-6.
2
[Penetrating and perforating eye injuries in 343 patients due to auto accidents before and after compulsory seat belt legislation resulting in fines (1966-1998)].[1966年至1998年强制实施安全带立法并对违规处以罚款前后,343例因交通事故导致的穿透性和穿孔性眼外伤患者]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2000 Jul;217(1):23-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-10379.
3
Eye injuries in Northern Ireland two years after seat belt legislation.安全带立法实施两年后北爱尔兰的眼部损伤情况。
Br J Ophthalmol. 1986 Jun;70(6):460-2. doi: 10.1136/bjo.70.6.460.
4
Incidence of ocular injuries from road traffic accidents after introduction of seat belt legislation.安全带立法实施后道路交通事故所致眼外伤的发生率
J R Soc Med. 1984 Mar;77(3):198-200. doi: 10.1177/014107688407700309.
5
Penetrating eye injuries in road traffic accidents.道路交通事故中的穿透性眼外伤。
Arch Emerg Med. 1988 Mar;5(1):21-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.5.1.21.
6
Ocular injury requiring hospitalisation in the south east of Ireland: 2001-2007.爱尔兰东南部需要住院治疗的眼部损伤:2001-2007 年。
Injury. 2010 Jan;41(1):86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.01.118.
7
Penetrating eye injuries associated with motor vehicle accidents.与机动车事故相关的穿透性眼外伤。
Med J Aust. 1976 Jun 12;1(24):912-4.
8
The effect of seatbelt legislation on hospital admissions with road traffic injuries in an oil-rich, fast-developing country.安全带立法对一个石油资源丰富、快速发展国家道路交通伤住院情况的影响。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2007 Jun;14(2):103-7. doi: 10.1080/17457300701212033.
9
[Incidence of injuries caused by windshields following implementation of the 1984 seat belt law].
Fortschr Ophthalmol. 1986;83(4):420-1.
10
Simultaneous injuries to both eyes in traffic accidents.交通事故中双眼同时受伤。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec;249(12):1761-4. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1473-z. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.