Frick M H, Heinonen O P, Huttunen J K, Koskinen P, Mänttäri M, Manninen V
First Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Ann Med. 1993 Feb;25(1):41-5. doi: 10.3109/07853899309147855.
During screening in the Helsinki Heart Study (HHS), a 5-year coronary primary prevention trial with gemfibrozil, some 600 dyslipidaemic individuals were detected who exhibited symptoms and signs of possible coronary heart disease (CHD). These subjects were excluded from the primary study. To secure successful conduct in the HSS, an ancillary protocol was developed for the treatment of these individuals. Three-hundred and eleven subjects were randomized to receive gemfibrozil 600 mg twice daily and 317 subjects to receive a matching placebo over 5 years in a double-blind fashion. The end-point rate, consisting of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction and cardiac death, did not differ significantly between the placebo and gemfibrozil groups. The same was true for total mortality. Missing key prognostic factors, e.g. true prevalence of CHD, extent of coronary artery obstructions, degree of left ventricular dysfunction, and their distribution in the groups render the results less reliable and hence the data cannot be used to refute the thesis that treatment of dyslipidaemia in manifest CHD in successful.
在赫尔辛基心脏研究(HHS)中,一项使用吉非贝齐进行的为期5年的冠心病一级预防试验的筛查期间,检测出约600名血脂异常个体,他们表现出可能患有冠心病(CHD)的症状和体征。这些受试者被排除在主要研究之外。为确保HSS研究的顺利进行,制定了一项辅助方案来治疗这些个体。311名受试者被随机分配接受每日两次600毫克吉非贝齐治疗,317名受试者以双盲方式接受匹配的安慰剂治疗,为期5年。由致命和非致命心肌梗死及心源性死亡组成的终点发生率在安慰剂组和吉非贝齐组之间无显著差异。总死亡率情况相同。缺少关键的预后因素,如冠心病的真实患病率、冠状动脉阻塞程度、左心室功能障碍程度及其在各组中的分布,使得结果可靠性降低,因此这些数据不能用于反驳在明显冠心病中进行血脂异常治疗是成功的这一论点。