Suppr超能文献

开具深静脉血栓预防药物时进行正式分层分析的理由。

The case for formal stratification analysis when prescribing deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis.

作者信息

Bahal V, Silverman S H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Wordsley Hospital, West Midlands, UK.

出版信息

J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1993 Feb;38(1):33-5.

PMID:8437149
Abstract

Postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is common following general and orthopaedic surgery. Certain factors are known to increase the risk of DVT. To ascertain how surgeons use these factors to assess DVT risk and modify their DVT prophylaxis for individual cases, we circulated a questionnaire to 100 general and 200 orthopaedic surgeons. We inquired about whether DVT prophylaxis was used, and what risk factors were recognized, and we asked the surgeons to ascribe a level of DVT risk for five imaginary cases. All surgeons claimed to use prophylaxis. Most surgeons were largely aware of the accepted risk factors. There was, however, no consensus in allocating level of risk to individual imaginary cases. In conclusion, in spite of being aware of risk factors, similar patients are being dealt with in widely different ways by different clinicians. Therefore, we feel it is important to formally assess each individual patient's DVT risk and prescribe prophylaxis accordingly.

摘要

术后深静脉血栓形成(DVT)在普通外科手术和骨科手术后很常见。已知某些因素会增加深静脉血栓形成的风险。为了确定外科医生如何利用这些因素评估深静脉血栓形成风险并针对个别病例调整其深静脉血栓形成预防措施,我们向100名普通外科医生和200名骨科医生发放了一份问卷。我们询问了是否使用了深静脉血栓形成预防措施、识别了哪些风险因素,并要求外科医生对五个虚拟病例的深静脉血栓形成风险程度进行评估。所有外科医生均声称会采取预防措施。大多数外科医生在很大程度上了解公认的风险因素。然而,在为个别虚拟病例分配风险程度方面并未达成共识。总之,尽管了解风险因素,但不同的临床医生对相似患者的处理方式却大相径庭。因此,我们认为正式评估每个患者的深静脉血栓形成风险并相应地开出预防措施很重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验