• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[脓毒症综合征患者使用抗内毒素抗体HA-1A(Centoxin)进行免疫治疗;按方案选择患者后结果尚可]

[Immunotherapy using the anti-endotoxin antibody HA-1A (Centoxin) in patients with sepsis syndrome; fair results following protocol selection of patients].

作者信息

Costongs L G, Speelman P, van Lieshout J J, van Deventer S J, Lubbers M J, Schipper H G

机构信息

Afd. Intensive Care, Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1993 Feb 13;137(7):355-60.

PMID:8437634
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of HA-1A treatment in patients with the sepsis syndrome.

DESIGN

Descriptive.

SETTING

Department of intensive care, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Intensive-care patients with the sepsis syndrome and shock or organ failure with a presumptive diagnosis of Gram-negative infection were eligible for treatment with HA-1A. We analysed and compared the results with those of the double-blind, randomized HA-1A study by Ziegler et al.

RESULTS

Between May 1991 and March 1992, 27 patients were treated with HA-1A. The mortality rate was 59% (16/27). Among the 11 patients with a Gram-negative bacteraemia mortality was 7/11, much higher than in the Ziegler study (30%). In comparison with the HA-1A study we selected sicker patients: the mean APACHE II score was higher, 93% of our patients were in shock and 85% had organ failure. More patients presented with an intra-abdominal sepsis and mortality in this group was very high (11/14). In patients with a Gram-negative bacteraemia the delay between the onset of the sepsis syndrome and the administration of HA-1A was longer (median 22 h versus 14.3 h in the Ziegler study, mean 30 versus 20 h).

CONCLUSION

HA-1A does not appear to be beneficial in critically ill patients with a longstanding sepsis syndrome, especially not if an intra-abdominal sepsis is apparent. Therefore, we decided not to use H-1A until additional data become available. Additional objective inclusion criteria are needed to improve the identification of the patient group that may benefit from treatment with HA-1A.

摘要

目的

评估HA-1A治疗脓毒症综合征患者的效果。

设计

描述性研究。

地点

阿姆斯特丹学术医疗中心重症监护科。

患者与方法

患有脓毒症综合征且伴有休克或器官衰竭、初步诊断为革兰氏阴性菌感染的重症监护患者有资格接受HA-1A治疗。我们分析并将结果与齐格勒等人的双盲、随机HA-1A研究结果进行比较。

结果

1991年5月至1992年3月期间,27例患者接受了HA-1A治疗。死亡率为59%(16/27)。在11例革兰氏阴性菌血症患者中,死亡率为7/11,远高于齐格勒研究中的死亡率(30%)。与HA-1A研究相比,我们选择的患者病情更重:平均急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)得分更高,93%的患者处于休克状态,85%的患者出现器官衰竭。更多患者出现腹腔内脓毒症,该组死亡率非常高(11/14)。在革兰氏阴性菌血症患者中,脓毒症综合征发作至给予HA-1A的延迟时间更长(中位数为22小时,而齐格勒研究中为14.3小时;平均为30小时,而齐格勒研究中为20小时)。

结论

HA-1A对患有长期脓毒症综合征的重症患者似乎并无益处,尤其是在腹腔内脓毒症明显的情况下。因此,在获得更多数据之前,我们决定不使用HA-1A。需要额外的客观纳入标准来更好地确定可能从HA-1A治疗中获益的患者群体。

相似文献

1
[Immunotherapy using the anti-endotoxin antibody HA-1A (Centoxin) in patients with sepsis syndrome; fair results following protocol selection of patients].[脓毒症综合征患者使用抗内毒素抗体HA-1A(Centoxin)进行免疫治疗;按方案选择患者后结果尚可]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1993 Feb 13;137(7):355-60.
2
[Immunotherapy using the anti-endotoxin antibody HA-1A in patients with sepsis syndrome; good results in relation to treatment with placebo].[在脓毒症综合征患者中使用抗内毒素抗体HA-1A进行免疫治疗;与安慰剂治疗相比效果良好]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1993 Feb 13;137(7):350-4.
3
Treatment of gram-negative bacteremia and septic shock with HA-1A human monoclonal antibody against endotoxin. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The HA-1A Sepsis Study Group.使用抗内毒素的HA-1A人单克隆抗体治疗革兰氏阴性菌血症和感染性休克。一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。HA-1A脓毒症研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 14;324(7):429-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102143240701.
4
Gram-negative sepsis, the sepsis syndrome, and the role of antiendotoxin monoclonal antibodies.革兰氏阴性菌败血症、败血症综合征及抗内毒素单克隆抗体的作用
Clin Pharm. 1992 Mar;11(3):223-35.
5
Treatment of septic shock with human monoclonal antibody HA-1A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. CHESS Trial Study Group.用人源单克隆抗体HA-1A治疗感染性休克。一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。CHESS试验研究组。
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jul 1;121(1):1-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-1-199407010-00001.
6
The French National Registry of HA-1A (Centoxin) in septic shock. A cohort study of 600 patients. The National Committee for the Evaluation of Centoxin.法国脓毒性休克患者HA-1A(商品名:Centoxin)全国注册研究。一项针对600例患者的队列研究。Centoxin评估全国委员会。
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Nov 14;154(21):2484-91.
7
A second large controlled clinical study of E5, a monoclonal antibody to endotoxin: results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. The E5 Sepsis Study Group.第二项关于E5(一种抗内毒素单克隆抗体)的大型对照临床研究:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照试验的结果。E5脓毒症研究小组。
Crit Care Med. 1995 Jun;23(6):994-1006. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199506000-00003.
8
Adoptive immunotherapy of gram-negative sepsis: use of monoclonal antibodies to lipopolysaccharide.革兰氏阴性菌败血症的过继性免疫疗法:脂多糖单克隆抗体的应用。
Crit Care Med. 1993 Feb;21(2 Suppl):S32-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199302001-00007.
9
[Introduction of immunotherapeutic agents in clinical practice; current status concerning anti-endotoxin antibody HA-1A in the control of sepsis].[免疫治疗药物在临床实践中的应用介绍;抗内毒素抗体HA-1A在脓毒症控制中的现状]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1993 Feb 13;137(7):334-6.
10
A controlled clinical trial of E5 murine monoclonal IgM antibody to endotoxin in the treatment of gram-negative sepsis. The XOMA Sepsis Study Group.E5鼠抗内毒素单克隆IgM抗体治疗革兰氏阴性败血症的对照临床试验。XOMA败血症研究小组。
JAMA. 1991 Aug 28;266(8):1097-102.

引用本文的文献

1
Sepsis: Inflammation Is a Necessary Evil.脓毒症:炎症是一把双刃剑。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Jun 20;7:108. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00108. eCollection 2019.
2
Receptors, mediators, and mechanisms involved in bacterial sepsis and septic shock.参与细菌性败血症和脓毒性休克的受体、介质及机制。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003 Jul;16(3):379-414. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.3.379-414.2003.