Suppr超能文献

[脓毒症综合征患者使用抗内毒素抗体HA-1A(Centoxin)进行免疫治疗;按方案选择患者后结果尚可]

[Immunotherapy using the anti-endotoxin antibody HA-1A (Centoxin) in patients with sepsis syndrome; fair results following protocol selection of patients].

作者信息

Costongs L G, Speelman P, van Lieshout J J, van Deventer S J, Lubbers M J, Schipper H G

机构信息

Afd. Intensive Care, Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1993 Feb 13;137(7):355-60.

PMID:8437634
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of HA-1A treatment in patients with the sepsis syndrome.

DESIGN

Descriptive.

SETTING

Department of intensive care, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Intensive-care patients with the sepsis syndrome and shock or organ failure with a presumptive diagnosis of Gram-negative infection were eligible for treatment with HA-1A. We analysed and compared the results with those of the double-blind, randomized HA-1A study by Ziegler et al.

RESULTS

Between May 1991 and March 1992, 27 patients were treated with HA-1A. The mortality rate was 59% (16/27). Among the 11 patients with a Gram-negative bacteraemia mortality was 7/11, much higher than in the Ziegler study (30%). In comparison with the HA-1A study we selected sicker patients: the mean APACHE II score was higher, 93% of our patients were in shock and 85% had organ failure. More patients presented with an intra-abdominal sepsis and mortality in this group was very high (11/14). In patients with a Gram-negative bacteraemia the delay between the onset of the sepsis syndrome and the administration of HA-1A was longer (median 22 h versus 14.3 h in the Ziegler study, mean 30 versus 20 h).

CONCLUSION

HA-1A does not appear to be beneficial in critically ill patients with a longstanding sepsis syndrome, especially not if an intra-abdominal sepsis is apparent. Therefore, we decided not to use H-1A until additional data become available. Additional objective inclusion criteria are needed to improve the identification of the patient group that may benefit from treatment with HA-1A.

摘要

目的

评估HA-1A治疗脓毒症综合征患者的效果。

设计

描述性研究。

地点

阿姆斯特丹学术医疗中心重症监护科。

患者与方法

患有脓毒症综合征且伴有休克或器官衰竭、初步诊断为革兰氏阴性菌感染的重症监护患者有资格接受HA-1A治疗。我们分析并将结果与齐格勒等人的双盲、随机HA-1A研究结果进行比较。

结果

1991年5月至1992年3月期间,27例患者接受了HA-1A治疗。死亡率为59%(16/27)。在11例革兰氏阴性菌血症患者中,死亡率为7/11,远高于齐格勒研究中的死亡率(30%)。与HA-1A研究相比,我们选择的患者病情更重:平均急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)得分更高,93%的患者处于休克状态,85%的患者出现器官衰竭。更多患者出现腹腔内脓毒症,该组死亡率非常高(11/14)。在革兰氏阴性菌血症患者中,脓毒症综合征发作至给予HA-1A的延迟时间更长(中位数为22小时,而齐格勒研究中为14.3小时;平均为30小时,而齐格勒研究中为20小时)。

结论

HA-1A对患有长期脓毒症综合征的重症患者似乎并无益处,尤其是在腹腔内脓毒症明显的情况下。因此,在获得更多数据之前,我们决定不使用HA-1A。需要额外的客观纳入标准来更好地确定可能从HA-1A治疗中获益的患者群体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验