Eslinger P J, Grattan L M
Department of Medicine (Division of Neurology), Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey 17033.
Neuropsychologia. 1993 Jan;31(1):17-28. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(93)90077-d.
Frontal lobe and basal ganglia lesions have been associated with similar cognitive impairments, although their specialized roles in behavior are likely to be different. We examined whether these structures mediate distinctive or overlapping aspects of a complex behavioral process that has been associated with both neural sites, i.e. cognitive flexibility. Patients with focal ischemic lesions to the frontal lobe and basal ganglia were compared on two forms of cognitive flexibility: (1) shifting response set (i.e. reactive flexibility), and (2) producing a diversity of ideas (i.e. spontaneous flexibility). Results indicated that frontal lobe and basal ganglia damage each caused a similar degree of impairment in reactive flexibility, both groups performing at a significantly lower level than posterior cortical lesion and normal comparison groups. However, frontal lobe damage markedly disturbed spontaneous flexibility, while performance after basal ganglia lesion was significantly higher and comparable to posterior cortical lesions. Findings suggest that the frontal lobe and basal ganglia participate differently in the neural substrate of cognitive flexibility. The frontal lobe appears to mediate spontaneous flexibility. The production of diverse ideas may require direct cortical-cortical interactions by the frontal lobe in order to access knowledge systems with novel strategies that transcend the most common semantic linkages. In contrast the corticostriate system appears to mediate reactive flexibility, as the frontal lobe, basal ganglia and their interconnections are required for its operation.
额叶和基底神经节病变与类似的认知障碍有关,尽管它们在行为中的特定作用可能不同。我们研究了这些结构是否介导了一个与这两个神经部位都相关的复杂行为过程的不同或重叠方面,即认知灵活性。对患有额叶和基底神经节局灶性缺血性病变的患者在两种认知灵活性形式上进行了比较:(1)转换反应定势(即反应性灵活性),以及(2)产生多种想法(即自发性灵活性)。结果表明,额叶和基底神经节损伤在反应性灵活性方面各自造成了相似程度的损害,两组的表现均显著低于后皮质病变组和正常对照组。然而,额叶损伤明显干扰了自发性灵活性,而基底神经节病变后的表现则显著更高,且与后皮质病变相当。研究结果表明,额叶和基底神经节在认知灵活性的神经基质中发挥着不同的作用。额叶似乎介导自发性灵活性。产生多种想法可能需要额叶进行直接的皮质-皮质相互作用,以便通过超越最常见语义联系的新策略来获取知识系统。相比之下,皮质纹状体系统似乎介导反应性灵活性,因为其运作需要额叶、基底神经节及其相互连接。