• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Treatment effectiveness for legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance clients.

作者信息

Brecht M L, Anglin M D, Wang J C

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles.

出版信息

Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1993;19(1):89-106. doi: 10.3109/00952999309002668.

DOI:10.3109/00952999309002668
PMID:8438834
Abstract

Analyses examined whether addicts reporting themselves coerced into drug abuse treatment by actions of the criminal justice system differed from voluntary admissions in their response to treatment, and whether such responsiveness varied across gender or ethnicity. Six hundred eighteen methadone maintenance clients admitted to programs in six southern California counties were categorized into high, moderate, and low legal coercion levels. Multivariate analysis of variance procedures for repeated measures (before, during, and after initial treatment episode) were used to test relevant hypotheses. Dependent variables included criminal justice system contact, criminal activities, drug and alcohol involvement, and measures of social functioning. Few differences within any measured domain were found among the three groups. All groups were similar in showing substantial improvement in levels of narcotics use, criminal activities, and most other behaviors during treatment with some regression in these behaviors posttreatment. Results support legal coercion as a valid motivation for treatment entry; those coerced into treatment respond in ways similar to voluntary admissions regardless of gender or ethnicity.

摘要

相似文献

1
Treatment effectiveness for legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance clients.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1993;19(1):89-106. doi: 10.3109/00952999309002668.
2
Ethnic differences in narcotics addiction. II. Chicano and Anglo addiction career patterns.
Int J Addict. 1988 Oct;23(10):1011-27. doi: 10.3109/10826088809056182.
3
Ethnic differences in narcotics addiction. I. Characteristics of Chicano and Anglo methadone maintenance clients.麻醉品成瘾中的种族差异。一、墨西哥裔美国人和英裔美籍美沙酮维持治疗患者的特征。
Int J Addict. 1988 Feb;23(2):125-49. doi: 10.3109/10826088809085112.
4
Compulsory supervision and methadone maintenance.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 1996 Jan-Feb;13(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/0740-5472(95)02024-1.
5
The role of coercion in rehabilitation of drug abusers.
Int J Addict. 1983 Jan;18(1):9-21. doi: 10.3109/10826088309027280.
6
The costly bonus: cocaine related crime among methadone treatment clients.
Adv Alcohol Subst Abuse. 1986 Winter;6(2):107-22. doi: 10.1300/J251v06n02_08.
7
A randomized controlled trial of interim methadone maintenance.美沙酮维持治疗中期的一项随机对照试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;63(1):102-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.1.102.
8
Sex differences in addict careers. 4. Treatment.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1987;13(3):253-80. doi: 10.3109/00952998709001513.
9
Changes in criminal activity after entering methadone maintenance.
Br J Addict. 1992 Feb;87(2):251-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb02699.x.
10
Pre- and in-treatment predictors of retention in methadone treatment using survival analysis.
Addiction. 1998 Jan;93(1):51-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.931516.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacotherapy for opioid addiction in community corrections.社区矫正中的阿片类药物成瘾的药物治疗。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;30(5):117-135. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2018.1524373. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
2
When is coercive methadone therapy justified?强制美沙酮治疗在何时是合理的?
Bioethics. 2018 Sep;32(7):405-413. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12451. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
3
Italian psychiatry.意大利精神病学。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;30(2):117. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2018.1435761.
4
A Systematic Analysis of Treatment Effects on Depressive Symptom Severity by Level of Coercion.按强制程度对抑郁症状严重程度治疗效果的系统分析
Psychiatr Q. 2017 Mar;88(1):39-46. doi: 10.1007/s11126-016-9433-3.
5
Prompted to treatment by the criminal justice system: Relationships with treatment retention and outcome among cocaine users.受刑事司法系统推动而接受治疗:可卡因使用者的治疗留存率及治疗效果之间的关系
Am J Addict. 2015 Apr;24(3):225-232. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12208. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
6
Treatment Outcomes of African American Buprenorphine Patients by Parole and Probation Status.按假释和缓刑状态划分的非裔美国丁丙诺啡患者的治疗结果
J Drug Issues. 2014 Jan;44(1):69-82. doi: 10.1177/0022042613491106.
7
Posttreatment drug use abstinence: does the majority program clientele matter?治疗后药物使用戒断:大多数项目客户群体重要吗?
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2014;13(3):185-208. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2013.826159.
8
Does Mandated Treatment Benefit Youth? A Prospective Investigation of Adolescent Justice System Involvement, Treatment Motivation, and Substance Use Outcomes.强制治疗对青少年有益吗?对青少年司法系统参与情况、治疗动机和物质使用结果的前瞻性调查。
Alcohol Treat Q. 2013 Jan 1;31(4):431-449. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2013.831671.
9
Improvements in outcomes in methadone patients on probation/parole regardless of counseling early in treatment.美沙酮患者在缓刑/假释期间的治疗结果得到改善,无论早期治疗中是否接受咨询。
J Addict Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;7(2):133-8. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e318284a0c1.
10
Assessing youth participation in AA-related helping: validity of the Service to Others in Sobriety (SOS) questionnaire in an adolescent sample.评估青少年在互助戒酒中的参与度:青少年样本中“他人服务于清醒”(SOS)问卷的有效性。
Am J Addict. 2013 Jan;22(1):60-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2013.00322.x.