• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服昂丹司琼预防接受环磷酰胺化疗的门诊患者呕吐的疗效。昂丹司琼研究组。

Efficacy of oral ondansetron in the prevention of emesis in outpatients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. The Ondansetron Study Group.

作者信息

Beck T M, Ciociola A A, Jones S E, Harvey W H, Tchekmedyian N S, Chang A, Galvin D, Hart N E

机构信息

Mountain States Tumor Institute, Boise, Idaho 83712-6297.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1993 Mar 15;118(6):407-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-6-199303150-00002.

DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-118-6-199303150-00002
PMID:8439113
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral ondansetron (Zofran) as an antiemetic in patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy.

DESIGN

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, stratified, placebo-controlled trial conducted between March 1989 and January 1990.

SETTING

Twenty-seven oncology centers including university hospitals, community cancer centers, and private medical oncology practices.

PATIENTS

A total of 349 chemotherapy-naive patients having their first cycle of cyclophosphamide (> or = 450 mg/m2)-based chemotherapy. Patients also received methotrexate (> or = 30 mg/m2) or doxorubicin (> or = 35 mg/m2). All patients were evaluated for safety and 318 (91%) were evaluated for efficacy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: placebo, 1 mg, 4 mg, or 8 mg of ondansetron. Assigned study medication was taken three times per day for 3 consecutive days.

MEASUREMENTS

Time and number of emetic episodes as well as degree of nausea were recorded by patients for each of the 3 study days.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, all three doses of ondansetron were superior (P < 0.001) in preventing vomiting and controlling nausea. A complete response (no emetic episodes) was observed in 19%, 57%, 65%, and 66% of patients in the placebo, 1-mg, 4-mg, and 8-mg ondansetron groups, respectively. For patients who received higher-dose cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, a dose-related trend in antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron was observed. Mild headache and constipation were the most frequently reported adverse events. No extrapyramidal reactions were observed.

CONCLUSION

Oral ondansetron is a safe and effective antiemetic that is more efficacious than placebo for patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy.

摘要

目的

评估口服昂丹司琼(枢复宁)作为接受环磷酰胺化疗患者的止吐药的疗效和安全性。

设计

1989年3月至1990年1月进行的一项多中心、随机、双盲、分层、安慰剂对照试验。

地点

27个肿瘤中心,包括大学医院、社区癌症中心和私立医学肿瘤诊所。

患者

总共349例未接受过化疗的患者进行其首个基于环磷酰胺(≥450mg/m²)的化疗周期。患者还接受了甲氨蝶呤(≥30mg/m²)或多柔比星(≥35mg/m²)。所有患者均进行了安全性评估,318例(91%)进行了疗效评估。

干预措施

患者被随机分配到四个治疗组之一:安慰剂、1mg、4mg或8mg昂丹司琼。指定的研究药物每天服用三次,连续服用3天。

测量指标

患者在3个研究日中的每一天记录呕吐发作的时间和次数以及恶心程度。

结果

与安慰剂相比,所有三个剂量的昂丹司琼在预防呕吐和控制恶心方面均更具优势(P<0.001)。安慰剂组、1mg、4mg和8mg昂丹司琼组分别有19%、57%、65%和66%的患者出现完全缓解(无呕吐发作)。对于接受高剂量环磷酰胺和多柔比星的患者,观察到昂丹司琼的止吐疗效呈剂量相关趋势。轻度头痛和便秘是最常报告的不良事件。未观察到锥体外系反应。

结论

口服昂丹司琼是一种安全有效的止吐药,对于接受基于环磷酰胺化疗的患者比安慰剂更有效。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of oral ondansetron in the prevention of emesis in outpatients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. The Ondansetron Study Group.口服昂丹司琼预防接受环磷酰胺化疗的门诊患者呕吐的疗效。昂丹司琼研究组。
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Mar 15;118(6):407-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-6-199303150-00002.
2
Efficacy of oral ondansetron, a selective antagonist of 5-HT3 receptors, in the treatment of nausea and vomiting associated with cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapies. Ondansetron Study Group.5-羟色胺3受体选择性拮抗剂昂丹司琼口服制剂治疗环磷酰胺化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的疗效。昂丹司琼研究组。
Am J Clin Oncol. 1994 Apr;17(2):137-46. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199404000-00010.
3
Efficacy of ondansetron tablets in the management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: review of clinical trials.昂丹司琼片在治疗化疗引起的呕吐中的疗效:临床试验综述
Semin Oncol. 1992 Dec;19(6 Suppl 15):20-5.
4
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy of combination olanzapine, ondansetron and dexamethasone for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide.一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,评估奥氮平、昂丹司琼和地塞米松联合用药对接受多柔比星加环磷酰胺化疗的患者预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的疗效。
Ann Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;8(4):372-380. doi: 10.21037/apm.2019.08.04. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
5
Oral ondansetron in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting induced by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in women with breast cancer. Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.口服昂丹司琼预防乳腺癌女性患者使用环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和5-氟尿嘧啶(CMF)引起的恶心和呕吐。一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的结果。
Ann Oncol. 1993 Jun;4(6):475-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058556.
6
Evaluation of three oral dosages of ondansetron in the prevention of nausea and emesis associated with cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin chemotherapy.三种口服剂量昂丹司琼预防环磷酰胺-阿霉素化疗相关恶心和呕吐的评估。
J Clin Oncol. 1991 Jul;9(7):1268-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.7.1268.
7
Comparison of single-dose oral granisetron versus intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized parallel study.单剂量口服格拉司琼与静脉注射昂丹司琼预防中度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的比较:一项多中心、双盲、随机平行研究。
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Feb;16(2):754-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.2.754.
8
Ondansetron for nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.昂丹司琼用于预防中度致吐性癌症化疗引起的恶心和呕吐。
Clin Ther. 1995 Nov-Dec;17(6):1091-8. doi: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80087-5.
9
Oral ondansetron 8 mg twice daily is as effective as 8 mg three times daily in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. S3A-376 Study Group.
Cancer Invest. 1997;15(4):297-303. doi: 10.3109/07357909709039729.
10
Comparable safety and antiemetic efficacy of a brief (30-second bolus) intravenous granisetron infusion and a standard (15-minute) intravenous ondansetron infusion in breast cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.在接受中度致吐性化疗的乳腺癌患者中,短暂(30秒推注)静脉注射格拉司琼与标准(15分钟)静脉注射昂丹司琼的安全性和止吐疗效相当。
Cancer J Sci Am. 1998 Jan-Feb;4(1):52-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Equipoise: asking the right questions for clinical trial design.均衡:为临床试验设计提出正确的问题。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 10;9(4):230-5. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.211.
2
[Management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: what is the standard after 20 years of clinical research].[化疗引起的呕吐的管理:经过20年临床研究后何为标准]
Med Klin (Munich). 1998 Jan;93 Suppl 1:3-17. doi: 10.1007/BF03041988.
3
Aprepitant as salvage antiemetic therapy in breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide.阿瑞匹坦作为蒽环类和环磷酰胺化疗乳腺癌患者的解救性止吐治疗。
Support Care Cancer. 2009 Aug;17(8):1065-70. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0545-7. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
4
Not all placebos are the same: a debate on the ethics of placebo use in clinical trials versus clinical practice.并非所有安慰剂都是一样的:关于临床试验与临床实践中使用安慰剂的伦理辩论。
J Anesth. 2007;21(1):102-5. doi: 10.1007/s00540-006-0440-7. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
5
Ondansetron: costs and resource utilisation in a US teaching hospital setting.昂丹司琼:美国一家教学医院环境中的成本与资源利用情况
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Jun;3(6):471-81. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199303060-00007.
6
5-Hydroxyindoleacetic acid excretion following combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil plus ondansetron compared to ondansetron alone.与单独使用昂丹司琼相比,环磷酰胺、表柔比星和5-氟尿嘧啶联合化疗加昂丹司琼后5-羟吲哚乙酸的排泄情况。
Support Care Cancer. 1996 Sep;4(5):384-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01788846.
7
5-Hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) and cortisol excretion as predictors of chemotherapy-induced emesis.5-羟吲哚乙酸(5-HIAA)和皮质醇排泄作为化疗引起呕吐的预测指标。
Br J Cancer. 1996 Oct;74(7):1137-40. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.503.
8
Comparative studies of various antiemetic regimens.各种止吐方案的比较研究。
Support Care Cancer. 1996 Jul;4(4):270-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01358879.
9
Dose-ranging evaluation of the antiemetic efficacy of intravenous dolasetron in patients receiving chemotherapy with doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide.
Support Care Cancer. 1996 Mar;4(2):141-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01845763.