• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公开招生与残疾学生:问题、担忧、恐惧及预期益处。

Open enrollment and students with disabilities: issues, concerns, fears, and anticipated benefits.

作者信息

Ysseldyke J E, Thurlow M L, Algozzine B, Nathan J

机构信息

College of Education, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

出版信息

Except Child. 1993 Mar-Apr;59(5):390-401. doi: 10.1177/001440299305900502.

DOI:10.1177/001440299305900502
PMID:8440298
Abstract

Open enrollment is a hotly debated form of educational choice. More than 25 states have legislation establishing or expanding public school choice options. At an issues clarification working session, professionals, legislators, policymakers, parents, and students described issues and generated implications for serving students with disabilities. Participants identified three kinds of issues for districts and students: outcome, implementation, and demographic. Participants also expressed other concerns about choice: pupil benefit, parent involvement (or convenience), teacher/administrator job protection, change, and teacher workload.

摘要

公开招生是一种备受争议的教育选择形式。超过25个州制定了相关立法,以确立或扩大公立学校的选择方案。在一次问题澄清工作会议上,专业人士、立法者、政策制定者、家长和学生描述了相关问题,并提出了为残疾学生提供服务的影响因素。参与者为学区和学生确定了三类问题:结果、实施和人口统计学。参与者还表达了对选择的其他担忧:学生受益、家长参与(或便利性)、教师/管理人员的工作保障、变革以及教师工作量。

相似文献

1
Open enrollment and students with disabilities: issues, concerns, fears, and anticipated benefits.公开招生与残疾学生:问题、担忧、恐惧及预期益处。
Except Child. 1993 Mar-Apr;59(5):390-401. doi: 10.1177/001440299305900502.
2
Special education for students with disabilities: analysis and recommendations.残疾学生的特殊教育:分析与建议
Future Child. 1996 Spring;6(1):4-24.
3
Legal standards for an appropriate education in the post-Rowley era.
Except Child. 1992 May;58(6):488-94. doi: 10.1177/001440299205800603.
4
[Rehabilitation overseas. Integration of handicapped students at American community colleges].[海外康复。美国社区学院残疾学生的融入]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1988 Nov;27(4):221-7.
5
Children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury: reintegration challenges in educational settings.患有创伤性脑损伤的儿童和青少年:教育环境中的重新融入挑战。
J Learn Disabil. 1996 Sep;29(5):549-60. doi: 10.1177/002221949602900509.
6
Making the transition to postsecondary education and training.
Except Child. 1990;57(3):264-70. doi: 10.1177/001440299105700309.
7
The public laws for education of the disabled--the pediatrician's role.残疾人教育的公共法律——儿科医生的角色。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1991 Oct;12(5):327-39.
8
Assistive technology benefits for students with disabilities.辅助技术对残疾学生的益处。
J Sch Health. 1998 Mar;68(3):120-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1998.tb03497.x.
9
The Detsel case: limitation of school health services for special education students.
J Sch Health. 1989 Jan;59(1):37-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1989.tb04648.x.
10
Narrowing the gap between policy and practice.
Except Child. 1990 Oct-Nov;57(2):186-90.