Fischer T M, Carew T J
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520.
J Neurosci. 1993 Mar;13(3):1302-14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-03-01302.1993.
The siphon withdrawal response (SWR) of Aplysia supports several forms of learning that are under both excitatory and inhibitory control. Here we examine the role of interneuronal processing on the regulation of siphon responses, with an emphasis on the role of inhibition. We focus on the recurrent circuit formed by the excitatory interneuron L29 and the inhibitory interneuron L30, and show that this circuit provides a mechanism for use-dependent regulation of excitatory input onto siphon motor neurons. We utilized a reduced preparation in which input to the SWR circuit was elicited by taps applied to the siphon; tap-evoked EPSPs were measured in LFS siphon motor neurons. We first show that L29 is an important source of excitatory input to LFS motor neurons: voltage-clamp inactivation of a single L29 (out of five) results in a significant reduction of tap-evoked EPSPs. Next, we demonstrate that direct intracellular activation of L29, surprisingly, produces transient inhibition of evoked input to motor neurons that lasts up to 40 sec. We then provide several lines of evidence that the mechanism of L29-induced inhibition is through the recruitment and potentiation of recurrent inhibition from L30: (1) L29 activation results in reduced tap-evoked responses of other (nonactivated) L29s; (2) direct activation of L30 mimics the inhibitory effects produced by L29 activation (LFS neurons receive no direct synaptic input from L30); and (3) the L30 IPSP is significantly potentiated as a result of its own activity, whether produced directly (by L30 activation) or indirectly (through L29 activation). This IPSP potentiation has the same time course as L29-induced inhibition of motor neuron responses. Thus activity-dependent potentiation of L30 transmission can inhibit motor neuron responses, in part through inactivation of the L29 interneuronal pool. Finally, we propose that L29-L30 interactions provide a mechanism for dynamic gain control in the SWR.
海兔的虹吸式退缩反应(SWR)支持多种形式的学习,这些学习受兴奋性和抑制性控制。在这里,我们研究中间神经元处理在虹吸反应调节中的作用,重点是抑制作用的作用。我们关注由兴奋性中间神经元L29和抑制性中间神经元L30形成的循环回路,并表明该回路为依赖于使用的虹吸运动神经元兴奋性输入调节提供了一种机制。我们使用了一种简化的标本制备,其中通过轻敲虹吸来引发对SWR回路的输入;在低频刺激(LFS)的虹吸运动神经元中测量轻敲诱发的兴奋性突触后电位(EPSP)。我们首先表明L29是LFS运动神经元兴奋性输入的重要来源:五个L29中的一个(单个L29)的电压钳失活导致轻敲诱发的EPSP显著降低。接下来,我们证明令人惊讶的是,直接对L29进行细胞内激活会对运动神经元的诱发输入产生持续长达40秒的短暂抑制。然后,我们提供了几条证据表明L29诱导的抑制机制是通过募集和增强来自L30的循环抑制:(1)L29激活导致其他(未激活的)L29的轻敲诱发反应降低;(2)直接激活L30模拟L29激活产生的抑制作用(LFS神经元不接受来自L30的直接突触输入);(3)L30的抑制性突触后电位(IPSP)由于其自身活动而显著增强,无论是直接产生(通过L30激活)还是间接产生(通过L29激活)。这种IPSP增强与L29诱导的运动神经元反应抑制具有相同的时间进程。因此,L30传递的活动依赖性增强可以部分通过L29中间神经元池的失活来抑制运动神经元反应。最后,我们提出L29 - L30相互作用为SWR中的动态增益控制提供了一种机制。