McCaughrin W B, Ellis W K, Rusch F R, Heal L W
University of Delaware, Department of Educational Studies, Newark 19716.
Ment Retard. 1993 Feb;31(1):41-8.
Monetary costs and benefits of supported employment to individuals, taxpayers, and society were assessed as was the cost-effectiveness of the nonmonetary benefit, namely, quality of life of employees, as a result of supported employment. Participants were 20 individuals from two Central Illinois agencies serving clients with developmental disabilities. Costs and effects were evaluated using benefit-cost and cost-effectiveness analyses. Supported employment was found to be cost-beneficial from the perspectives of the supported employee, the taxpayer, and society over a 5-year period as programs move from sheltered employment. In addition, supported employment was also more cost-effective with regard to quality of life than was sheltered employment.
评估了支持性就业对个人、纳税人及社会的货币成本和收益,以及作为支持性就业结果的非货币收益(即员工生活质量)的成本效益。参与者是来自伊利诺伊州中部两个为发育障碍客户提供服务的机构的20名个人。使用效益成本分析和成本效益分析对成本和效果进行了评估。随着项目从庇护性就业转变,在5年期间,从受支持员工、纳税人及社会的角度来看,支持性就业被发现具有成本效益。此外,在生活质量方面,支持性就业也比庇护性就业更具成本效益。