Sackeim H A, Prudic J, Devanand D P, Kiersky J E, Fitzsimons L, Moody B J, McElhiney M C, Coleman E A, Settembrino J M
Department of Biological Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, NY 10032.
N Engl J Med. 1993 Mar 25;328(12):839-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199303253281204.
The efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in major depression is established, but the importance of the electrical dosage and electrode placement in relation to efficacy and side effects is uncertain.
In a double-blind study, we randomly assigned 96 depressed patients to receive right unilateral or bilateral electroconvulsive therapy at either a low electrical dose (just above the seizure threshold) or a high dose (2.5 times the threshold). Symptoms of depression and cognitive functioning were assessed before, during, immediately after, and two months after therapy. Patients who responded to treatment were followed for one year to assess the rate of relapse.
The response rate for low-dose unilateral electroconvulsive therapy was 17 percent, as compared with 43 percent for high-dose unilateral therapy (P = 0.054), 65 percent for low-dose bilateral therapy (P = 0.001), and 63 percent for high-dose bilateral therapy (P = 0.001). Regardless of electrode placement, high dosage resulted in more rapid improvement (P < 0.05). Compared with the low-dose unilateral group, the high-dose unilateral group took 83 percent longer (P < 0.001) to recover orientation after seizure induction, whereas the combined bilateral groups took 252 percent longer (P < 0.001). During the week after treatment, there was three times more retrograde amnesia about personal information with bilateral therapy (P < 0.001). There were no differences between treatment groups in cognitive effects two months after treatment. Forty-one of the 70 patients who responded to therapy (59 percent) relapsed, and there were no differences between treatment groups.
Increasing the electrical dosage increases the efficacy of right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy, although not to the level of bilateral therapy. High electrical dosage is associated with a more rapid response, and unilateral treatment is associated with less severe cognitive side effects after treatment.
电休克治疗对重度抑郁症的疗效已得到证实,但电剂量和电极放置与疗效及副作用之间的关系尚不确定。
在一项双盲研究中,我们将96名抑郁症患者随机分为两组,分别接受低电剂量(略高于癫痫发作阈值)或高剂量(阈值的2.5倍)的右侧单侧或双侧电休克治疗。在治疗前、治疗期间、治疗后即刻以及治疗后两个月对抑郁症状和认知功能进行评估。对治疗有反应的患者随访一年以评估复发率。
低剂量单侧电休克治疗的有效率为17%,高剂量单侧治疗为43%(P = 0.054),低剂量双侧治疗为65%(P = 0.001),高剂量双侧治疗为63%(P = 0.001)。无论电极放置情况如何,高剂量治疗均能带来更快的改善(P < 0.05)。与低剂量单侧组相比,高剂量单侧组在诱发癫痫发作后恢复定向的时间长83%(P < 0.001),而双侧联合组则长252%(P < 0.001)。在治疗后的一周内,双侧治疗导致的关于个人信息的逆行性遗忘是单侧治疗的三倍(P < 0.001)。治疗两个月后,各治疗组在认知影响方面没有差异。70名对治疗有反应的患者中有41名(59%)复发,各治疗组之间无差异。
增加电剂量可提高右侧单侧电休克治疗的疗效,尽管未达到双侧治疗的水平。高电剂量与更快的反应相关,而单侧治疗与治疗后较轻的认知副作用相关。