Theroux M C, West D W, Corddry D H, Hyde P M, Bachrach S J, Cronan K M, Kettrick R G
Alfred I. duPont Institute, Wilmington, DE 19899.
Pediatrics. 1993 Mar;91(3):624-7.
Sedating children safely and effectively for minor laceration repair is a well-recognized clinical problem. A randomized, double-blind, and controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal midazolam for reducing stress during the suturing of lacerations in preschool children. Fifty-nine children with simple lacerations that required suturing were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Group 1 received intranasal midazolam, 0.4 mg/kg, prior to suturing. Group 2 received an equivalent volume of normal saline intranasally prior to suturing as a placebo. Group 3 was the control group and received no intervention prior to suturing. Heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and pulse oximetry were monitored at 5-minute intervals throughout the procedure. Subjective variables were also measured at 5-minute intervals and included a cry score, a motion score, and a struggle score. Parent satisfaction was measured via a short telephone interview the following day. There were no significant differences in outcome between the placebo group and the control group. Their results were pooled and compared with the results for the midazolam group. The midazolam group showed significant reductions for mean heart rate, maximum heart rate, and maximum systolic blood pressure when compared with the placebo/control group. Scores for two of the three subjective variables, cry and struggle, were significantly reduced for the midazolam group. The papoose board was considered unnecessary in retrospect for more than half of patients in the midazolam group compared with only one fifth of patients in the placebo/control group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
安全有效地为儿童轻度撕裂伤缝合进行镇静是一个公认的临床问题。一项随机、双盲、对照研究旨在评估鼻内给予咪达唑仑对减轻学龄前儿童撕裂伤缝合过程中应激反应的疗效。59名需要缝合简单撕裂伤的儿童被随机分为三组。第一组在缝合前鼻内给予0.4mg/kg咪达唑仑。第二组在缝合前鼻内给予等量生理盐水作为安慰剂。第三组为对照组,缝合前不进行干预。在整个过程中每隔5分钟监测心率、呼吸频率、血压和脉搏血氧饱和度。主观变量也每隔5分钟测量一次,包括哭闹评分、活动评分和挣扎评分。次日通过简短电话访谈测量家长满意度。安慰剂组和对照组的结果无显著差异。将它们的结果合并并与咪达唑仑组的结果进行比较。与安慰剂/对照组相比,咪达唑仑组的平均心率、最高心率和最高收缩压显著降低。咪达唑仑组三个主观变量中的两个,即哭闹和挣扎评分显著降低。与安慰剂/对照组仅五分之一的患者相比,咪达唑仑组超过一半的患者事后认为无需使用约束固定板。(摘要截选至250字)