Martin Sarah R, Bauer Kelly, Heyming Theodore W, Zhu Jenny, Lee Helen, Kain Zeev N
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA.
Center on Stress & Health, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Jul;32(7):768-775. doi: 10.1111/acem.15106. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Pediatric laceration repairs are common in the emergency department (ED) and often associated with significant procedural anxiety. Despite the increased use of intranasal midazolam (INM) prior to pediatric ED procedures, there is limited, real-world data on the effects of INM on anxiety. This study aimed to describe the proportion of children who were nonresponsive to INM (i.e., exhibited extreme anxiety) and identify factors associated with INM nonresponse.
This cross-sectional study included a sample of 102 children (ages 2-10 years) who received 0.2 mg/kg INM prior to laceration repair in the ED. Procedural anxiety was assessed using the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS). Children exhibiting extreme procedural anxiety (mYPAS score ≥72.91) when procedure started were labeled as INM nonresponders. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses explored associations between child age, temperament, laceration location, time from INM administration, and likelihood of INM nonresponse.
In this sample, 45.1% of the children were classified as INM nonresponders, exhibiting extreme procedural anxiety. Bivariate analyses indicated that nonresponders were younger, had lower sociability temperament, longer delay between INM administration and the procedure, and were more likely to have extremity lacerations. In the logistic regression, younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.79, p = 0.034), lower sociability temperament (OR 0.28, p = 0.002), and extremity lacerations (OR 8.04, p = 0.009) were significantly associated with likelihood of INM nonresponse.
Nearly half of the children in our sample exhibited extreme procedural anxiety despite receiving INM. The high incidence of nonresponse to INM has important clinical practice implications and suggests that 0.2 mg/kg INM alone may not be sufficient to manage all pediatric procedural anxiety in the ED. Findings highlight a need for further research examining multimodal strategies to manage procedural anxiety in the pediatric ED, particularly for younger children with low sociability temperament or extremity lacerations.
背景/目的:儿科裂伤修复在急诊科很常见,且常伴有严重的操作焦虑。尽管在儿科急诊科操作前增加了鼻内咪达唑仑(INM)的使用,但关于INM对焦虑影响的实际数据有限。本研究旨在描述对INM无反应(即表现出极度焦虑)的儿童比例,并确定与INM无反应相关的因素。
这项横断面研究纳入了102名2至10岁儿童的样本,这些儿童在急诊科进行裂伤修复前接受了0.2mg/kg的INM。使用改良耶鲁术前焦虑量表(mYPAS)评估操作焦虑。在操作开始时表现出极度操作焦虑(mYPAS评分≥72.91)的儿童被标记为INM无反应者。二元和多变量逻辑回归分析探讨了儿童年龄、气质、裂伤部位、INM给药时间与INM无反应可能性之间的关联。
在这个样本中,45.1%的儿童被归类为INM无反应者,表现出极度操作焦虑。二元分析表明,无反应者年龄较小,社交气质较低,INM给药与操作之间的延迟较长,且更有可能有四肢裂伤。在逻辑回归中,年龄较小(比值比[OR]0.79,p = 0.034)、社交气质较低(OR 0.28,p = 0.002)和四肢裂伤(OR 8.04,p = 0.009)与INM无反应的可能性显著相关。
尽管接受了INM,但我们样本中近一半的儿童表现出极度操作焦虑。INM无反应的高发生率具有重要的临床实践意义,表明仅0.2mg/kg的INM可能不足以控制急诊科所有儿科操作焦虑。研究结果凸显了进一步研究探讨多模式策略以管理儿科急诊科操作焦虑的必要性,特别是对于社交气质较低或有四肢裂伤的年幼儿童。