McCall R B, Kennedy C B, Dodds C
Child Dev. 1977 Mar;48(1):79-87.
Infants 3 1/2 months of age were assessed for the possible role of the dissimilarity of the distracting stimulus to the originally learned standard in a modified familiarization-distraction-test paradigm. When data for all subjects were analyzed, there was no evidence that the distraction had any interfering effect at all on the memory for the original standard. However, specialized analyses suggested that interference varied with the likelihood that subjects actually encoded the distracting stimuli might govern the probability or extent that an infant encodes the distracting stimulus rather than affecting the interference process directly.
在一个经过修改的熟悉-分心-测试范式中,对3个半月大的婴儿进行了评估,以确定分心刺激与最初学习的标准之间的差异可能起到的作用。当对所有受试者的数据进行分析时,没有证据表明分心对原始标准的记忆有任何干扰作用。然而,专门分析表明,干扰随受试者实际编码分心刺激的可能性而变化,这可能决定婴儿编码分心刺激的概率或程度,而不是直接影响干扰过程。