Valentine R J, Rossi M B, Myers S I, Clagett G P
Department of Surgery, Dallas Veterans Administration Medical Center, TX.
J Vasc Surg. 1993 Mar;17(3):602-6. doi: 10.1067/mva.1993.38151.
Because of the spleen's extensive collateral circulation, the risk of splenic infarction after splenorenal arterial bypass (SRB) has been considered negligible. We report four patients in whom splenic infarctions developed after SRB. Splenic infarction developed in one patient at the time of SRB, and symptoms of splenic abscess (fever, abdominal pain, and leukocytosis) that proved to be splenic infarctions at laparotomy developed in three patients 2 to 16 days after the operation. Factors possibly contributing to splenic infarction could be determined for three patients. These included interruption of collateral vessels, intraoperative hypotension and disseminated intravascular coagulation, and distal splenic artery ligation. Normal Doppler flow was detected in the splenic parenchyma during test occlusions of the splenic artery before SRB in three patients. Our experience suggests that existing collateral circulation may not always sustain splenic viability after SRB, and some patients may not be suitable candidates for this operation. Factors such as adequacy of inflow, splenic artery length, and risk of perioperative hypotension should be considered.
由于脾脏广泛的侧支循环,脾肾动脉搭桥术(SRB)后发生脾梗死的风险一直被认为可忽略不计。我们报告了4例在SRB后发生脾梗死的患者。1例患者在SRB时发生脾梗死,3例患者在术后2至16天出现脾脓肿症状(发热、腹痛和白细胞增多),剖腹探查时证实为脾梗死。对3例患者可确定可能导致脾梗死的因素。这些因素包括侧支血管中断、术中低血压和弥散性血管内凝血以及脾动脉远端结扎。3例患者在SRB前进行脾动脉试验性阻断时,脾实质内检测到正常的多普勒血流。我们的经验表明,现有的侧支循环在SRB后可能并不总能维持脾脏的活力,一些患者可能不适合进行该手术。应考虑诸如流入量是否充足、脾动脉长度以及围手术期低血压风险等因素。