Neale H W, Kurtzman L C, Goh K B, Billmire D A, Yakuboff K P, Warden G
Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993 Apr;91(4):624-31. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199304000-00009.
Radovan's 1982 landmark work on the clinical use of tissue expanders was felt to be a panacea for multiple reconstructive problems. We have used and probably overused tissue expanders for reconstruction of many complicated pediatric facial burn problems. This has enlightened us to some of the limitations of their use, and we have, therefore, reassessed our indications for their use. From 1984 through 1990, 52 tissue expanders were used in 37 pediatric patients for face and anterior neck burn scar resurfacing. This experience, combined with the unique problems encountered with face and neck tissue expansion, provided the groundwork for operative guidelines. The long-term effects of gravity, growth, and scarring on facial features adjacent to expanded skin led to the following principles. (1) Caution should be used in advancing expanded neck skin beyond the border of the mandible. The risk of scar widening or possible lip or eyelid ectropion needs to be considered when planning these flaps. Extreme overexpansion is necessary to advance unburned neck flaps over the mandibular border to avoid these problems. (2) After advancement or rotational flaps neck flaps to the face, vertically directed suture lines in the neck may need redirection to prevent linear contracture. This correction may be performed during the primary operation or during revisions. (3) Expanded cheek or neck skin should preferably replace burned areas, but at the same time, not violate unburned facial aesthetic units. (4) To counteract the affects of gravity, expanded cheek skin in conjunction with expanded neck skin, if unburned, may be the best choice for face or mandibular border scar replacement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
拉多万1982年关于组织扩张器临床应用的里程碑式著作被认为是解决多种重建问题的万灵药。我们曾使用并可能过度使用组织扩张器来修复许多复杂的小儿面部烧伤问题。这使我们认识到了其使用的一些局限性,因此,我们重新评估了使用组织扩张器的适应症。1984年至1990年期间,37例儿科患者共使用了52个组织扩张器用于面部和颈部前部烧伤瘢痕的修复。这段经历,再加上面部和颈部组织扩张中遇到的独特问题,为手术指南奠定了基础。重力、生长和瘢痕形成对扩张皮肤相邻面部特征的长期影响导致了以下原则。(1)将扩张后的颈部皮肤推进到下颌骨边界之外时应谨慎。在设计这些皮瓣时,需要考虑瘢痕增宽或可能出现的唇或眼睑外翻的风险。必须进行极度过度扩张,才能将未烧伤的颈部皮瓣推进到下颌骨边界上方,以避免这些问题。(2)将颈部皮瓣推进或旋转至面部后,颈部垂直方向的缝线可能需要重新定向,以防止线性挛缩。这种矫正可在初次手术或修复手术期间进行。(3)扩张后的脸颊或颈部皮肤最好用于替代烧伤区域,但同时,不应侵犯未烧伤的面部美学单位。(4)为了抵消重力的影响,扩张后的脸颊皮肤与扩张后的颈部皮肤(如果未烧伤)结合,可能是替代面部或下颌骨边界瘢痕的最佳选择。(摘要截选至250字)