Hershorn M
Nova University, School of Psychology, Coral Springs, FL 33065.
Community Ment Health J. 1993 Feb;29(1):49-57. doi: 10.1007/BF00760630.
The present investigation was an attempt to determine characteristics of those who appeared versus those who did not appear for initial intake evaluation appointments at a traditional community mental center. Subjects were 189 individuals contacting the center for service from November of 1989 to April of 1990. Data were collected via self-report questionnaire and blind rating by clinical social workers of presenting problem for diagnostic category. Data analysis involved Chi-square procedures and Analysis of Variance. Those who appeared for initial appointment versus those who did not were differentiated with respect to employment versus unemployment, length of unemployment, tenure at current job, number of jobs in the past year, number of residences in the past year, tenure at current residence and number of marriages. Groups did not differ with respect to age, gender, ethnicity, martial status, income, educational attainment, legal difficulties, public assistance, referral sources, alcohol/drug problems, and a variety of variables related to mental health or treatment history and diagnostic category. Results were interpreted as supporting the hypothesis that attendance was related to recent life stability as opposed to more general demographic and socioeconomic factors and clinically related variables. Implications for increasing treatment utilization, particularly by those who are underserved in community mental health, were discussed.
本研究旨在确定在一家传统社区精神中心接受初次评估预约时出现的人和未出现的人的特征。研究对象为189名在1989年11月至1990年4月期间联系该中心寻求服务的个体。数据通过自我报告问卷以及临床社会工作者对呈现问题的诊断类别进行盲评来收集。数据分析采用卡方检验和方差分析。就就业与失业情况、失业时长、当前工作任期、过去一年的工作数量、过去一年的居住数量、当前居住任期以及婚姻数量而言,前来参加初次预约的人和未参加的人存在差异。两组在年龄、性别、种族、婚姻状况、收入、教育程度、法律问题、公共援助、转介来源、酒精/药物问题以及与心理健康或治疗史和诊断类别相关的各种变量方面没有差异。结果被解释为支持这样一种假设,即就诊与近期生活稳定性有关,而非与更一般的人口统计学和社会经济因素以及临床相关变量有关。文中还讨论了提高治疗利用率的意义,特别是对于社区心理健康服务不足人群的治疗利用率。