Bunc V, Leso J
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czechoslovakia.
J Sports Sci. 1993 Feb;11(1):43-8. doi: 10.1080/02640419308729962.
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of increasing specific (rowing ergometer) and non-specific (cycle ergometer) workloads on parameters relating to the ventilatory threshold (Tvent) and work efficiency. When highly trained male rowers were tested using non-specific workloads, their %VO2 max values at Tvent were close to those characteristic of untrained subjects (74.6 +/- 6.2% VO2 max). However, when we tested the same subjects using specific workloads, we recorded values typical of highly trained athletes (85.0 +/- 4.4% VO2 max). For the non-specific exercise on the cycle ergometer, we recorded work efficiency values close to those of untrained subjects (22.8 +/- 2.1%); however, for the specific exercise on the rowing ergometer, we recorded much lower values (16.4 +/- 3.1%). Because of the results of the non-specific submaximal exercise tests, we suggest caution in the interpretation of physiological variables that may be sensitive to training status. The evaluation of Tvent and work efficiency as supplementary parameters during laboratory studies will enable researchers to ascertain the effectiveness of the training process used, as well as indicating the specificity of the loading apparatus.
本研究的目的是确定增加特定(划船测力计)和非特定(自行车测力计)工作量对与通气阈值(Tvent)和工作效率相关参数的影响。当使用非特定工作量对训练有素的男性赛艇运动员进行测试时,他们在Tvent时的最大摄氧量百分比值接近未经训练受试者的特征值(最大摄氧量的74.6±6.2%)。然而,当我们使用特定工作量对同一受试者进行测试时,记录到的是训练有素的运动员的典型值(最大摄氧量的85.0±4.4%)。对于自行车测力计上的非特定运动,我们记录的工作效率值接近未经训练受试者的效率值(22.8±2.1%);然而,对于划船测力计上的特定运动,我们记录的值要低得多(16.4±3.1%)。鉴于非特定次最大运动测试的结果,我们建议在解释可能对训练状态敏感的生理变量时要谨慎。在实验室研究中将Tvent和工作效率作为补充参数进行评估,将使研究人员能够确定所采用训练过程的有效性,以及表明负荷器械的特异性。