Shanks J E, Wilson R H, Cambron N K
VA Medical Center, Long Beach, CA.
J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Feb;36(1):178-85.
Three methods for compensating multiple frequency acoustic admittance measurements for ear canal volume were studied in 26 men with normal middle ear transmission systems. Peak compensated static acoustic admittance (magnitude of y) and phase angle (phi) were calculated from sweep frequency tympanograms (226-1243 Hz in 113 Hz increments). Of the procedures used to compensate for volume in rectangular form, the ear canal pressure used to estimate volume had the largest effect on the estimate of middle ear resonance. Median resonance was 800 Hz for admittance measurements compensated at 200 daPa versus 1100 Hz for measurements compensated at -350 daPa. The remaining two methods, compensation of susceptance only versus both susceptance and conductance and compensation using the minimum volume versus separate volumes at each frequency, did not affect estimates of middle ear resonance. Estimates of middle ear resonance from compensated phase angle measurements also were compared with estimates of resonance from admittance and phase difference curves. Although resonance could not be estimated from the phase difference curve, resonance estimated from the admittance difference curve agreed with the estimate from compensated phase angle.
对26名中耳传导系统正常的男性研究了三种用于补偿耳道容积的多频声导纳测量方法。从扫频鼓室图(226 - 1243Hz,以113Hz为增量)计算出峰值补偿静态声导纳(y的幅值)和相位角(φ)。在用于以矩形形式补偿容积的程序中,用于估计容积的耳道压力对中耳共振的估计影响最大。对于在200 daPa下补偿的声导纳测量,共振中位数为800Hz,而对于在 - 350 daPa下补偿的测量,共振中位数为1100Hz。其余两种方法,仅补偿电纳与同时补偿电纳和电导,以及使用最小容积与每个频率下的单独容积进行补偿,均不影响中耳共振的估计。还将补偿相位角测量得到的中耳共振估计值与声导纳和相位差曲线的共振估计值进行了比较。尽管无法从相位差曲线估计共振,但从声导纳差曲线估计的共振与补偿相位角的估计值一致。