Hanks W D, Mortensen B A
Hearing and Speech Science Laboratories, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA.
J Am Acad Audiol. 1997 Feb;8(1):53-8.
Sweep frequency tympanograms compensating for ear canal volume at 200 and -400 daPa were obtained on 106 ears of 53 subjects during four different sessions. Resonance frequencies were obtained and analyzed to determine normative data, resonance differences between the compensation methods, and the interaction effect of running consecutive tympanograms. There were no gender or interaural differences for either compensation method. Although statistically significant, the compensation method by order interaction found between the first and second runs of tympanograms was not clinically significant. Compensation at 200 daPa was recommended when using sweep frequency tympanometry. Mean resonance frequency difference of the two compensation methods was 400 Hz. Large intersubject variability emphasized the need for audiologists to use proper compensation norms when examining middle ear resonance.
在四个不同时段,对53名受试者的106只耳朵进行了200和-400 daPa下补偿外耳道容积的扫频鼓室图检查。获取并分析共振频率,以确定标准数据、补偿方法之间的共振差异以及连续进行鼓室图检查的交互作用。两种补偿方法在性别或耳间均无差异。虽然鼓室图第一次和第二次检查之间发现的补偿方法按顺序交互作用具有统计学意义,但在临床上并不显著。使用扫频鼓室测量法时,建议在200 daPa下进行补偿。两种补偿方法的平均共振频率差异为400 Hz。受试者间的较大变异性强调了听力学家在检查中耳共振时使用适当补偿标准的必要性。