• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用人工耳蜗、触觉辅助设备或助听器的儿童的言语可懂度。

Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.

作者信息

Osberger M J, Maso M, Sam L K

机构信息

Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Feb;36(1):186-203. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3601.186.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.3601.186
PMID:8450658
Abstract

Speech intelligibility was measured in 31 children who used the 3M/House single-channel implant (n = 12), the Nucleus 22-Channel Cochlear Implant System (n = 15), or the Tactaid II + two-channel vibrotactile aid (n = 4). The subjects were divided into subgroups based on age at onset of deafness (early or late). The speech intelligibility of the experimental subjects was compared to that of children who were profoundly hearing impaired who used conventional hearing aids (n = 12) or no sensory aid (n = 2). The subjects with early onset of deafness who received their single- or multichannel cochlear implant before age 10 demonstrated the highest speech intelligibility, whereas subjects who did not receive their device until after age 10 had the poorest speech intelligibility. There was no obvious difference in the speech intelligibility scores of these subjects as a function of type of device (implant or tactile aid). On the average, the postimplant or tactile aid speech intelligibility of the subjects with early onset of deafness was similar to that of hearing aid users with hearing levels between 100 and 110 dB HL and limited hearing in the high frequencies. The speech intelligibility of subjects with late onset of deafness showed marked deterioration after the onset of deafness with relatively large improvements by most subjects after they received a single- or multichannel implant. The one subject with late onset of deafness who used a tactile aid showed no improvement in speech intelligibility.

摘要

对31名儿童的言语可懂度进行了测量,这些儿童分别使用3M/豪斯单通道植入物(n = 12)、Nucleus 22通道人工耳蜗系统(n = 15)或Tactaid II +双通道触觉辅助装置(n = 4)。根据耳聋发病年龄(早发或晚发)将受试者分为亚组。将实验受试者的言语可懂度与使用传统助听器(n = 12)或未使用感觉辅助装置(n = 2)的重度听力受损儿童的言语可懂度进行比较。在10岁之前接受单通道或多通道人工耳蜗植入的早发性耳聋受试者表现出最高的言语可懂度,而直到10岁以后才接受装置的受试者言语可懂度最差。这些受试者的言语可懂度得分在装置类型(植入物或触觉辅助装置)方面没有明显差异。平均而言,早发性耳聋受试者植入后或使用触觉辅助装置后的言语可懂度与听力水平在100至110 dB HL之间且高频听力有限的助听器使用者相似。晚发性耳聋受试者的言语可懂度在耳聋发病后明显下降,大多数受试者在接受单通道或多通道植入后有较大改善。一名使用触觉辅助装置的晚发性耳聋受试者的言语可懂度没有改善。

相似文献

1
Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.使用人工耳蜗、触觉辅助设备或助听器的儿童的言语可懂度。
J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Feb;36(1):186-203. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3601.186.
2
Comparison of multichannel tactile aids and multichannel cochlear implants in children with profound hearing impairments.重度听力障碍儿童中多通道触觉辅助设备与多通道人工耳蜗的比较。
Am J Otol. 1995 Jan;16(1):8-13.
3
Speech perception abilities of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.使用人工耳蜗、触觉辅助设备或助听器的儿童的言语感知能力。
Am J Otol. 1991;12 Suppl:105-15.
4
A comparison of vowel production by children with multichannel cochlear implants or tactile aids: perceptual evidence.多通道人工耳蜗或触觉辅助设备使用者的儿童元音发音比较:感知证据
Ear Hear. 1997 Aug;18(4):307-15. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199708000-00005.
5
Speech intelligibility of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1997 May;168:35-6.
6
A comparison of speech discrimination with cochlear implants and tactile aids.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Oct;94(4):2036-49. doi: 10.1121/1.407477.
7
Speech intelligibility of implanted children.植入儿童的言语清晰度。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995 Sep;166:399-401.
8
Influence of communication mode on speech intelligibility and syntactic structure of sentences in profoundly hearing impaired French children implanted between 5 and 9 years of age.沟通方式对5至9岁植入人工耳蜗的重度听力受损法国儿童的言语清晰度和句子句法结构的影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1998 Jun 1;44(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(98)00031-7.
9
Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.言语可懂度作为人工耳蜗植入术在语前聋成人中效果的预测因素。
Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):445-58. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820510b7.
10
Analysis of the spontaneous speech samples of children with cochlear implants or tactile aids.对接受人工耳蜗植入或使用触觉辅助设备的儿童的自发言语样本进行分析。
Am J Otol. 1991;12 Suppl:151-64.

引用本文的文献

1
Profiling of the Functional Status of Hearing Impaired Children Using Cochlear Implant in the Indian Scenario- an ICF Perspective.从国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)角度对印度使用人工耳蜗的听力受损儿童的功能状况进行剖析。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Mar;77(3):1386-1391. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05349-z. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
2
Outcomes of Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implantation in Case of Congenital Non-Syndromic Bilateral Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss: An Observational Study.先天性非综合征性双侧重度至极重度感音神经性听力损失患者的助听器和人工耳蜗植入效果:一项观察性研究。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug;74(Suppl 1):200-206. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01967-x. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
Study Protocol: Type 1 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial of a Behavioral Parent Training Intervention for Parents of Young Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.
研究方案:对有听障或重听幼儿的父母进行行为家长培训干预的 1 型混合有效性-实施试验。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 May 10;31(3):1163-1178. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00186. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
4
Acoustic Assessment of Tone Production of Prelingually-Deafened Mandarin-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implants.人工耳蜗植入的语前聋说普通话儿童声调产生的声学评估
Front Neurosci. 2020 Nov 4;14:592954. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.592954. eCollection 2020.
5
ENT in the context of global health.全球卫生背景下的耳鼻喉科。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Feb;101(2):93-96. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0138. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
6
Speech Intelligibility and Psychosocial Functioning in Deaf Children and Teens with Cochlear Implants.植入人工耳蜗的聋儿及青少年的言语可懂度和心理社会功能
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2017 Jul 1;22(3):278-289. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enx001.
7
Vowel production of Mandarin-speaking hearing aid users with different types of hearing loss.不同类型听力损失的普通话使用者的元音发音
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0178588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178588. eCollection 2017.
8
The Acoustics of Word-Initial Fricatives and Their Effect on Word-Level Intelligibility in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.词首擦音的声学特征及其对双侧人工耳蜗植入儿童单词级可懂度的影响
Ear Hear. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):42-56. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000349.
9
Comparisons of social competence in young children with and without hearing loss: a dynamic systems framework.有听力损失和无听力损失幼儿的社会能力比较:一个动态系统框架
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015 Apr;20(2):115-24. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enu040. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
10
Can children substitute for adult listeners in judging the intelligibility of the speech of children who are deaf or hard of hearing?在判断失聪或听力有障碍儿童的言语清晰度时,儿童能够替代成人听众吗?
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2015 Jan;46(1):56-63. doi: 10.1044/2014_LSHSS-13-0043.