Miyamoto Y, Takemori A E
Department of Pharmacology, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.
Life Sci. 1993;52(13):1129-34. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(93)90434-5.
In morphine-dependent mice, s.c. and i.t. administered naloxone produced withdrawal jumping (ED50 values were i.t. = s.c.) but i.c.v. administered naloxone failed to produce dose-dependent jumping. Peak times of jumping were earliest after i.t. administration of naloxone among the three administration routes. These results suggested that the spinal site was more sensitive to naloxone than the supraspinal site. Concomitant administration of naloxone i.c.v. and i.t. did not precipitate jumping. It was found that i.c.v. and i.t. injections of saline inhibited withdrawal jumping precipitated by s.c. administered naloxone and that the i.c.v. effect was more profound than the i.t. effect. I.c.v. injection of saline also delayed the peak time of withdrawal jumping precipitated by s.c. administered naloxone. These inhibitory effects of the injection procedures may explain the difficulty of i.c.v. administered naloxone and concomitant i.c.v. + i.t. administered naloxone to precipitate jumping, and may explain the difference in the ED50 values of naloxone and the time courses of jumping.
在吗啡依赖小鼠中,皮下和鞘内注射纳洛酮会引发戒断性跳跃(ED50值:鞘内注射 = 皮下注射),但脑室内注射纳洛酮未能产生剂量依赖性跳跃。在三种给药途径中,鞘内注射纳洛酮后跳跃的峰值时间最早。这些结果表明,脊髓部位对纳洛酮比脊髓以上部位更敏感。脑室内和鞘内同时注射纳洛酮不会引发跳跃。研究发现,脑室内和鞘内注射生理盐水可抑制皮下注射纳洛酮引发的戒断性跳跃,且脑室内注射的效果比鞘内注射更显著。脑室内注射生理盐水还延迟了皮下注射纳洛酮引发的戒断性跳跃的峰值时间。这些注射操作的抑制作用可能解释了脑室内注射纳洛酮以及脑室内 + 鞘内联合注射纳洛酮难以引发跳跃的原因,也可能解释了纳洛酮ED50值的差异以及跳跃的时间进程差异。