• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右心室梗死作为急性下壁心肌梗死后预后的独立预测因素。

Right ventricular infarction as an independent predictor of prognosis after acute inferior myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Zehender M, Kasper W, Kauder E, Schönthaler M, Geibel A, Olschewski M, Just H

机构信息

Abteilung für Kardiologie, Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinik Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 8;328(14):981-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304083281401.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM199304083281401
PMID:8450875
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute inferior myocardial infarction frequently involves the right ventricle. We hypothesized that right ventricular involvement, as diagnosed by ST-segment elevation in the right precordial lead V4R, may affect the prognosis of patients with inferior myocardial infarctions.

METHODS

In 200 consecutive patients admitted to the hospital with acute inferior myocardial infarctions, we assessed the prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of ST-segment elevation in lead V4R (as compared with four other diagnostic procedures) to identify right ventricular involvement and its prognostic implications for in-hospital and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

The in-hospital mortality after inferior myocardial infarction was 19 percent, and major complications occurred in 47 percent of the patients. The presence of ST-segment elevation in lead V4R in 107 patients (54 percent) was highly predictive of right ventricular infarction (sensitivity, 88 percent; specificity, 78 percent; diagnostic accuracy, 83 percent), as compared with the other diagnostic procedures. The patients with ST-segment elevation in lead V4R had a higher in-hospital mortality rate (31 percent vs. 6 percent, P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of major in-hospital complications (64 percent vs. 28 percent, P < 0.001) than did those without ST-elevation in V4R. Multiple logistic-regression analysis showed ST elevation in V4R to be independent of and superior to all other clinical variables available on admission for the prediction of in-hospital mortality (relative risk, 7.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.6 to 23) and major complications (relative risk, 4.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.4 to 9). The post-hospital course (follow-up, at least 1 year; mean follow-up, 37 months) was similar in patients with and in those without electrocardiographic evidence of right ventricular infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Right ventricular involvement during acute inferior myocardial infarction can be accurately diagnosed by the presence of ST-segment elevation in lead V4R, a finding that is a strong, independent predictor of major complications and in-hospital mortality. Electrocardiographic assessment of right ventricular infarction should be routinely performed in all patients with acute inferior myocardial infarctions.

摘要

背景

急性下壁心肌梗死常累及右心室。我们推测,根据右胸前导联V4R的ST段抬高所诊断的右心室受累,可能会影响下壁心肌梗死患者的预后。

方法

在200例因急性下壁心肌梗死入院的连续患者中,我们评估了V4R导联ST段抬高的发生率和诊断准确性(与其他四种诊断方法相比),以确定右心室受累情况及其对住院期间和长期预后的影响。

结果

下壁心肌梗死后的住院死亡率为19%,47%的患者发生了主要并发症。与其他诊断方法相比,107例患者(54%)V4R导联ST段抬高高度提示右心室梗死(敏感性88%;特异性78%;诊断准确性83%)。V4R导联ST段抬高的患者住院死亡率较高(31%对6%,P<0.001),住院主要并发症发生率也较高(64%对28%,P<0.001)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,V4R导联ST段抬高独立于入院时所有其他临床变量,且在预测住院死亡率(相对风险7.7;95%置信区间2.6至23)和主要并发症(相对风险4.7;95%置信区间2.4至9)方面优于其他变量。有和没有右心室梗死心电图证据的患者出院后的病程(随访至少1年;平均随访37个月)相似。

结论

急性下壁心肌梗死期间右心室受累可通过V4R导联ST段抬高准确诊断,这一发现是主要并发症和住院死亡率的有力独立预测指标。所有急性下壁心肌梗死患者均应常规进行右心室梗死的心电图评估。

相似文献

1
Right ventricular infarction as an independent predictor of prognosis after acute inferior myocardial infarction.右心室梗死作为急性下壁心肌梗死后预后的独立预测因素。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 8;328(14):981-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304083281401.
2
[Acute right ventricular myocardial infarct. New diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in a prognostically unfavorable disease picture].[急性右心室心肌梗死。在预后不佳的疾病表现中的新诊断和治疗方法]
Med Klin (Munich). 1994 Jul 15;89(7):351-9.
3
Prognostic significance of precordial ST segment depression on admission electrocardiogram in patients with inferior wall myocardial infarction.下壁心肌梗死患者入院心电图胸前导联ST段压低的预后意义
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Aug;28(2):313-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00173-8.
4
Prognostic significance of ST segment changes in lead aVR in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation.急性下壁伴 ST 段抬高心肌梗死患者 aVR 导联 ST 段变化的预后意义。
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(2):111-8.
5
The diagnostic and prognostic value of right ventricular myocardial velocities in inferior myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗下壁心肌梗死患者右心室心肌速度的诊断和预后价值。
Kardiol Pol. 2011;69(10):1054-61.
6
The impact of right ventricular involvement on the postdischarge long-term mortality in patients with acute inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.右心室受累对急性下壁 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者出院后远期死亡率的影响。
Angiology. 2010 Feb;61(2):179-83. doi: 10.1177/0003319709335032. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
7
Electrocardiographic differentiation between right coronary and left circumflex coronary arterial occlusion in isolated inferior wall myocardial infarction.孤立性下壁心肌梗死时右冠状动脉与左旋支冠状动脉闭塞的心电图鉴别
Indian Heart J. 1999 May-Jun;51(3):281-4.
8
Heart failure during first inferior acute myocardial infarction.首次下壁急性心肌梗死期间的心力衰竭
Coron Artery Dis. 1999 Oct;10(7):455-8.
9
ST elevation measurements differ in patients with inferior myocardial infarction and right ventricular infarction.下壁心肌梗死和右心室梗死患者的 ST 段抬高测量值存在差异。
Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;29(9):1067-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.06.033. Epub 2010 Sep 25.
10
Clinical significance of ST-segment elevation in lead V1 in patients with acute inferior wall Q-wave myocardial infarction.急性下壁Q波心肌梗死患者V1导联ST段抬高的临床意义
Am Heart J. 2001 Apr;141(4):615-20. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.113996.

引用本文的文献

1
Right ventricular myocardial infarction: cardiac magnetic resonance characteristics and prognostic implications.右心室心肌梗死:心脏磁共振特征及预后意义
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 14. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11750-7.
2
Contemporary treatment of right ventricular failure.右心室衰竭的现代治疗方法。
JHLT Open. 2024 Dec 30;7:100203. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100203. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Machine learning score to predict in-hospital outcomes in patients hospitalized in cardiac intensive care unit.用于预测入住心脏重症监护病房患者院内结局的机器学习评分
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 Dec 20;6(2):218-227. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae098. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Supervised machine learning including environmental factors to predict in-hospital outcomes in acute heart failure patients.包括环境因素的监督式机器学习,用于预测急性心力衰竭患者的院内结局。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 Dec 16;6(2):190-199. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae094. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Novel Therapies for Right Ventricular Failure.右心室衰竭的新型治疗方法
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Jan 18;27(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02157-9.
6
Management of Post-Myocardial Infarction Right Ventricular Failure.心肌梗死后右心室衰竭的管理
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Nov 26;2(1):100526. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100526. eCollection 2023 Jan-Feb.
7
Right Atrial and Right Ventricular Function Assessed by Speckle Tracking in Patients with Inferior Myocardial Infarction.斑点追踪技术评估下壁心肌梗死患者的右心房和右心室功能
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 1;23(4):123. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2304123. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Impact of right ventricular failure on the outcomes of acute inferior wall myocardial infarction.右心衰竭对急性下壁心肌梗死患者预后的影响。
Future Cardiol. 2024;20(10):563-569. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2378628. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Prognostic significance of haemodynamic parameters in patients with cardiogenic shock.心源性休克患者血流动力学参数的预后意义。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2023 Oct 25;12(10):651-660. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad095.
10
Efficacy of Coronary Sinus Pacing for Cardiogenic Shock Due to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-induced Sick Sinus Syndrome: Two Case Reports.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗致病态窦房结综合征引起的心源性休克的冠状窦起搏疗效:两例报告。
Intern Med. 2023 Nov 15;62(22):3355-3360. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1527-22. Epub 2023 Mar 31.