Suppr超能文献

双重对比钡灌肠检查前的清洁灌肠:有必要吗?

Cleansing enema prior to double-contrast barium enema examination: is it necessary?

作者信息

Hageman M J, Goei R

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Radiology. 1993 Apr;187(1):109-12. doi: 10.1148/radiology.187.1.8451396.

Abstract

In a prospective study, 443 patients referred for double-contrast barium enema examination were allocated to one of four regimens consisting of either 24 or 48 hours of clear liquids in combination with a cathartic laxative (magnesium sulfate), an irritant laxative (bisacodyl), and hydration. One regimen from each time group included a preliminary cleansing enema. Significantly higher bowel cleanliness scores were given to the 48-hour regimen with no cleansing enema (P < .0002). Scores for overall quality of the barium enema examination (based on detectability of a 1-cm lesion) showed no significant differences between a 24- and a 48-hour regimen, with or without a cleansing enema. No differences emerged in patient acceptance of the regimens, and 54%-57% of patients had no complaints about the preparation. The authors recommend a 48-hour preparation to minimize the risk of interfering fecal material, especially in subjects with colonic dysmotility. A time-consuming cleansing enema can be omitted.

摘要

在一项前瞻性研究中,443名因双对比钡灌肠检查而就诊的患者被分配到四种方案中的一种,这四种方案包括24小时或48小时的清流食,同时结合一种导泻剂(硫酸镁)、一种刺激性泻药(比沙可啶)以及补液。每个时间组的一种方案包括一次初步清洁灌肠。未进行清洁灌肠的48小时方案的肠道清洁度评分显著更高(P < .0002)。钡灌肠检查的总体质量评分(基于对1厘米病变的可检测性)显示,24小时和48小时方案之间,无论有无清洁灌肠,均无显著差异。各方案在患者接受度方面没有差异,54% - 57%的患者对准备过程没有抱怨。作者建议采用48小时的准备方案,以将干扰性粪便物质的风险降至最低,尤其是对于结肠动力障碍的患者。可以省去耗时的清洁灌肠。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验