Williams H J
Division of Rheumatology, Utah University School of Medicine, Salt Lake City 84132.
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1993 Mar;5(2):146-52. doi: 10.1097/00002281-199305020-00004.
The randomized controlled trial continues to be the standard for evaluating the clinical utility of new procedures or treatments. The randomized controlled trial seems to affect the clinical practice of physicians. Although the design of the randomized controlled trial is well described, consideration should be given to the questions asked and whether the trial is conducted and analyzed so that the questions can be answered. Comparative trials have become more frequent than placebo trials in the past decade, and clinical research financing is falling increasingly to the pharmaceutical industry. Process and outcome measures are receiving more attention. Various groups and committees are evaluating disease activity measures to delineate a small number that can become core or foundation measures. These measures are also being defined and standardized. The process is much further advanced for rheumatoid arthritis than for other diseases, and some common and perhaps "mundane" disease states are being neglected.
随机对照试验仍然是评估新程序或治疗方法临床效用的标准。随机对照试验似乎会影响医生的临床实践。虽然随机对照试验的设计已得到充分描述,但应考虑所提出的问题以及试验的实施和分析方式,以便能够回答这些问题。在过去十年中,比较试验比安慰剂试验更为常见,临床研究资金越来越多地落入制药行业手中。过程和结果测量受到了更多关注。各个团体和委员会正在评估疾病活动测量方法,以确定少数能够成为核心或基础测量方法的指标。这些指标也正在被定义和标准化。类风湿关节炎方面的进展比其他疾病要大得多,一些常见甚至可能“平凡”的疾病状态正被忽视。