Suppr超能文献

护理人员对长期护理中使用身体约束的看法。

Nursing personnel's perceptions of physical restraint use in long-term care.

作者信息

Schirm V, Gray M, Peoples M

出版信息

Clin Nurs Res. 1993 Feb;2(1):98-110. doi: 10.1177/105477389300200109.

Abstract

The use of physical restraints as an accepted clinical intervention was dramatically changed by enactment of legislation in the United States. As a result, nursing personnel's notions of restraints as a therapeutic intervention were challenged. This study was initiated to obtain a better understanding of the underlying motivations for restraint use as a clinical intervention and to provide data helpful to nursing staff as they make the transition to restraint-free care. In the study, 124 long-term-care nursing personnel were surveyed regarding their perceptions of restraint use, and were asked whether or not they would recommend using restraints in selected clinical situations. Results of stepwise regression showed that 40% of the variation in the recommendation to use restraints can be explained by the type of nursing personnel (licensed nurse vs. nursing assistant), liability and treatment concerns related to restraint use, age of the nursing staff, and a belief that reducing restraints increases the need for psychoactive medications.

摘要

在美国,相关立法的颁布极大地改变了将身体约束作为一种可接受的临床干预措施的使用情况。因此,护理人员将约束视为一种治疗性干预措施的观念受到了挑战。开展这项研究是为了更好地理解将约束作为临床干预措施的潜在动机,并为护理人员向无约束护理过渡提供有用的数据。在该研究中,对124名长期护理机构的护理人员进行了调查,询问他们对使用约束的看法,以及是否会在特定临床情况下推荐使用约束。逐步回归结果显示,使用约束建议中40%的差异可由护理人员类型(注册护士与护理助理)、与使用约束相关的责任和治疗担忧、护理人员年龄以及认为减少约束会增加精神活性药物需求的信念来解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验