Crissman J D, Sakr W A, Hussein M E, Pontes J E
Department of Pathology, Harper Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48201.
Prostate. 1993;22(2):155-62. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990220208.
The relation of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) or ductal dysplasia and the development of invasive prostate cancer is not clear. PIN, especially high grade, is usually associated with coexisting invasive cancer. Although some investigators have identified micro foci of invasive cancer evolving from PIN, the two are usually anatomically separated. Because of these distinct anatomic patterns, many investigators have concluded that PIN represents a "field effect" or marker of potential cancer progression, and is not directly involved in or leads to the development of invasive prostate cancer. We measured the DNA content in 49 foci of invasive cancer and 87 foci of PIN identified in 34 radical prostatectomies containing both PIN and invasive cancer. In addition, we examined 13 prostatectomies and 5 TUR specimens containing only PIN. We found that the majority of low grade PIN had normal or diploid range DNA and that approximately half of the high grade PIN were abnormal or aneuploid. Prostates with coexisting diploid range PIN and invasive cancer had an approximately equal number of diploid range and aneuploid invasive cancers. Conversely, almost all of the aneuploid PIN (usually high grade) had coexisting aneuploid invasive cancers. This would support the hypothesis that events in the progression of prostate cancer may be operative in both the development of PIN and invasive cancer.
前列腺上皮内瘤变(PIN)或导管发育异常与浸润性前列腺癌发生发展之间的关系尚不清楚。PIN,尤其是高级别PIN,通常与并存的浸润性癌相关。尽管一些研究者已识别出从PIN演变而来的浸润性癌微灶,但二者在解剖学上通常是分离的。由于存在这些不同的解剖学模式,许多研究者得出结论,PIN代表一种“场效应”或潜在癌症进展的标志物,并不直接参与或导致浸润性前列腺癌的发生。我们在34例同时含有PIN和浸润性癌的根治性前列腺切除标本中,测量了49个浸润性癌灶和87个PIN灶的DNA含量。此外,我们检查了13例仅含有PIN的前列腺切除标本和5例经尿道前列腺电切(TUR)标本。我们发现,大多数低级别PIN的DNA含量正常或处于二倍体范围,约一半的高级别PIN为异常或非整倍体。并存二倍体范围PIN和浸润性癌的前列腺中,二倍体范围和非整倍体浸润性癌的数量大致相等。相反,几乎所有非整倍体PIN(通常为高级别)均并存非整倍体浸润性癌。这将支持如下假说,即前列腺癌进展过程中的事件可能在PIN和浸润性癌的发生中均起作用。