Majeska R J, Port M, Einhorn T A
Department of Orthopaedics, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York.
J Bone Miner Res. 1993 Mar;8(3):277-89. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650080305.
Two sets of clonal cell populations differing in the expression of osteoblastic traits, the rat osteosarcoma cell lines ROS 17/2.8 and ROS 25/1 and the immortalized fetal rat calvarial cell lines RCT-1 and RCT-3, were compared for their ability to attach to a series of extracellular matrix (ECM) constituents in vitro. Both osteoblastic (ROS 17/2.8, RCT-3) and nonosteoblastic (ROS 25/1, RCT-1) cell lines attached in a time- and concentration-dependent manner to plates coated with fibronectin (FN), osteopontin (OP), type I collagen (Col I), type IV collagen (Col IV), and laminin (LN) but only weakly to osteocalcin (OC) and thrombospondin (TSP). In both systems, the osteoblastic and nonosteoblastic clones attached identically to FN. Both ROS 17/2.8 and ROS 25/1 attached to similar molar amounts of substrate with the same preference order: FN > LN > Col I > or = Col IV. Maximal ROS 17/2.8 attachment to OP was > or = Col I but required approximately 2.5 times more substrate. ROS 25/1 attached less effectively than ROS 17/2.8 to most non-FN substrates. RCT-3 cells attached similarly to ROS 17/2.8 except that the preference order for Col I and LN was reversed and attachment to OP was lower than for ROS 17/2.8 RCT-1 cells attached best to Col I rather than FN, and equaled or surpassed RCT-3 in attachment to other non-FN substrates. Thus in these experimental systems, cells expressing an osteoblast-like phenotype exhibited generally similar ECM attachment properties. Their nonosteoblastic counterparts recognized the same spectrum of ECM constituents but differed from the osteoblastic cells and from each other in the effectiveness of their attachment to substrates other than FN.
比较了两组在成骨细胞特性表达上存在差异的克隆细胞群体,即大鼠骨肉瘤细胞系ROS 17/2.8和ROS 25/1,以及永生化的胎鼠颅骨细胞系RCT-1和RCT-3,评估它们在体外附着于一系列细胞外基质(ECM)成分的能力。成骨细胞系(ROS 17/2.8、RCT-3)和非成骨细胞系(ROS 25/1、RCT-1)均以时间和浓度依赖的方式附着于包被有纤连蛋白(FN)、骨桥蛋白(OP)、I型胶原(Col I)、IV型胶原(Col IV)和层粘连蛋白(LN)的平板,但仅微弱附着于骨钙素(OC)和血小板反应蛋白(TSP)。在两个细胞体系中,成骨细胞和非成骨细胞克隆对FN的附着情况相同。ROS 17/2.8和ROS 25/1均以相似的摩尔量附着于底物,偏好顺序相同:FN > LN > Col I > 或 = Col IV。ROS 17/2.8对OP的最大附着量 > 或 = Col I,但所需底物量约为其2.5倍。ROS 25/1对大多数非FN底物的附着效果不如ROS 17/2.8。RCT-3细胞的附着情况与ROS 17/2.8相似,只是对Col I和LN的偏好顺序相反,且对OP的附着低于ROS 17/2.8。RCT-1细胞对Col I的附着最佳而非FN,在对其他非FN底物的附着方面与RCT-3相当或超过RCT-3。因此,在这些实验体系中,表达成骨细胞样表型的细胞通常表现出相似的ECM附着特性。它们的非成骨细胞对应物识别相同范围的ECM成分,但在除FN之外的底物附着效果上与成骨细胞不同,且彼此之间也存在差异。