• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

窄刃钳和宽刃钳在拆除陶瓷托槽时的效果比较。

Comparisons of the effectiveness of pliers with narrow and wide blades in debonding ceramic brackets.

作者信息

Bishara S E, Fehr D E

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Mar;103(3):253-7. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70006-A.

DOI:10.1016/0889-5406(93)70006-A
PMID:8456783
Abstract

The removal of most ceramic brackets is accomplished by specially designed pliers that apply some form of tensile or shear force to the tooth surface. While the shear and tensile bond strengths for ceramic brackets in vitro have been reported, a simulation of the actual force application when using sharp-edged debonding pliers to debond a bracket has not. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and the force levels generated by the use of both the wide and the narrow blades in the debonding of ceramic brackets. The present findings indicate that the narrow blades effectively debonded ceramic brackets with a significantly lower mean debonding force (120 kg/cm2) than the wider blades (150 kg/cm2). The surface area of the blade in contact with the bracket-adhesive interface is less for the narrow blade (2.0 mm) than for the wide blade (3.2 mm). This relatively smaller contact area is sufficient to debond a bracket at a significantly lower debonding force.

摘要

大多数陶瓷托槽的拆除是通过专门设计的钳子来完成的,这些钳子会对牙齿表面施加某种形式的拉力或剪切力。虽然已有关于陶瓷托槽在体外的剪切和拉伸粘结强度的报道,但尚未对使用边缘锋利的去粘结钳子去除托槽时实际施加力的情况进行模拟。本研究的目的是确定在拆除陶瓷托槽时使用宽刃和窄刃钳子的有效性以及所产生的力水平。目前的研究结果表明,窄刃能有效地拆除陶瓷托槽,其平均去粘结力(120 kg/cm²)明显低于宽刃(150 kg/cm²)。窄刃(2.0 mm)与托槽 - 粘结剂界面接触的刀片表面积比宽刃(3.2 mm)小。这种相对较小的接触面积足以在显著更低的去粘结力下去除托槽。

相似文献

1
Comparisons of the effectiveness of pliers with narrow and wide blades in debonding ceramic brackets.窄刃钳和宽刃钳在拆除陶瓷托槽时的效果比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Mar;103(3):253-7. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70006-A.
2
Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.两种新型陶瓷托槽设计的脱粘特性比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Jul;116(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70307-0.
3
Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.在模拟临床环境中,不同脱粘技术对陶瓷托槽脱粘力和失效模式的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Nov;132(5):680-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.035.
4
Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.新型可折叠陶瓷托槽脱粘特性的评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Nov;112(5):552-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70083-0.
5
A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives.不同陶瓷托槽、釉质处理剂和黏结剂脱黏强度的比较研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Aug;104(2):170-9. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81007-8.
6
Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.陶瓷和聚碳酸酯托槽脱粘后的失败特征及粘结强度评估:托槽基底硅烷化的影响
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Apr;30(2):176-82. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm100. Epub 2008 Jan 21.
7
Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.新型陶瓷托槽的粘结强度与脱粘特性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Dec;128(6):761-5; quiz 802. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.041.
8
Evaluation of the debonding characteristics of 2 ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.两种陶瓷托槽脱粘特性的评估:一项体外研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Mar;125(3):329-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.015.
9
Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs.陶瓷托槽底座设计的比较评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Jun;105(6):552-60. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70139-3.
10
The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks.在去除陶瓷托槽时使用脱粘钳:力的水平与釉质裂纹
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Sep;108(3):242-8. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70016-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of cotton roll biting on pain perception during orthodontic bracket debonding using Weingart pliers: A randomized controlled trial.使用温格特钳进行正畸托槽拆除时咬棉卷对疼痛感知的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Int Med Res. 2025 Sep;53(9):3000605251370333. doi: 10.1177/03000605251370333. Epub 2025 Sep 2.
2
Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study.陶瓷托槽脱落后釉质表面损伤:一项基于医院的研究。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2021 May 6;2021:5561040. doi: 10.1155/2021/5561040. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparison of two different debonding techniques in orthodontic treatment.
正畸治疗中两种不同去粘结技术的比较。
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017 Nov 8;8(2):71-78. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.2.079. eCollection 2017 Apr-Jun.
4
Comparison of shear bond strength to clinically simulated debonding of orthodontic brackets: An in vitro study.正畸托槽临床模拟脱粘的剪切粘结强度比较:一项体外研究。
J Orthod Sci. 2016 Jan-Mar;5(1):25-9. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.176655.
5
Reconditioning of ceramic orthodontic brackets with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser.用 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光对陶瓷正畸托槽进行再处理。
Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Jan;28(1):223-8. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1093-4. Epub 2012 May 15.
6
Comparison of shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets after different time lags between lasing and debonding.比较激光照射和脱粘之间不同时间延迟后陶瓷托槽的剪切粘结强度。
Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Nov;27(6):1151-5. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-1018-7. Epub 2011 Nov 11.