停止医疗治疗：布兰德案的影响
Withdrawing medical treatment: implications of the Bland case.
作者信息
Tribe D, Korgaonkar G
出版信息
Br J Nurs. 1993;2(1):84-6. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1993.2.1.84.
PMID:8457742
Abstract
The question of whether it is possible to withdraw a feeding system from a patient who is in a persistent vegetative state raises serious legal and ethical issues which have recently been discussed in the High Court. This article discusses the issues and the Court's conclusions in this particular case.
摘要
对于处于持续性植物状态的患者是否有可能撤掉喂食系统这一问题，引发了一些严重的法律和伦理问题，这些问题最近在高等法院进行了讨论。本文将探讨这些问题以及法院在这一特定案件中的结论。
相似文献
1
Withdrawing medical treatment: implications of the Bland case.停止医疗治疗：布兰德案的影响
Br J Nurs. 1993;2(1):84-6. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1993.2.1.84.
2
Withdrawing medical treatment: implications of the Bland case.停止医疗：布兰德案的影响
Br J Hosp Med. 1992;48(11):754-6.
3
Tube feeding dilemmas: can artificial nutrition and hydration be legally or ethically withheld or withdrawn?
J Adv Nurs. 1997 Feb;25(2):217-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025217.x.
4
Beyond Bland: a critique of the BMA guidance on withholding and withdrawing medical treatment.超越平淡：对英国医学协会关于停止和撤销医疗指导意见的批判
Leg Stud. 2000 Mar;20(1):66-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121x.2000.tb00133.x.
5
Moral principles in withdrawing basic life support from patients in the persistent vegetative state.
Br J Hosp Med. 1991 Dec;46(6):391-2.
6
Withdrawing treatment from patients in a persistent vegetative state.
Med J Aust. 1994;161(11-12):715-7.
7
Persistent vegetative state.持续性植物状态
BMJ. 1993 Apr 3;306(6882):934. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6882.934-a.
8
Westchester County Medical Center v. Hall.韦斯特切斯特县医疗中心诉霍尔案
Wests N Y Suppl. 1988;532:133-42.
9
10
Termination of nutrition and hydration in a child with vegetative state.对处于植物状态儿童停止营养和水分供给。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994 Jan;148(1):87-92. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1994.02170010089021.
Zotero 插件