• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定性数据的计算机分析:三种软件包的比较

Computer analysis of qualitative data: a comparison of three packages.

作者信息

Walker B L

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 1993 Feb;3(1):91-111. doi: 10.1177/104973239300300106.

DOI:10.1177/104973239300300106
PMID:8457794
Abstract

This article describes and compares three computer programs designed to assist in the analysis of narrative text. Ethnograph, GATOR, and Martin were compared in the context of a qualitative study of women and their husbands following mastectomy in order to (a) describe the fit between research purpose and program capabilities and (b) explore the influence, if any, of particular program features on research methods or analysis. The comparison suggests that methodological assistance provided by the programs involves differences in approach sufficient to make prior consideration of the fit between program capabilities and research purposes, methods, and style an important research decision. Descriptions of the programs and their application provide guidelines for comparison of these and other computer programs.

摘要

本文描述并比较了三个旨在辅助叙事文本分析的计算机程序。在一项关于乳房切除术后女性及其丈夫的定性研究中,对Ethnograph、GATOR和Martin这三个程序进行了比较,目的是:(a)描述研究目的与程序功能之间的契合度;(b)探讨特定程序功能对研究方法或分析的影响(如有)。比较结果表明,这些程序提供的方法学辅助在方法上存在差异,足以使事先考虑程序功能与研究目的、方法及风格之间的契合度成为一项重要的研究决策。对这些程序及其应用的描述为比较这些程序和其他计算机程序提供了指导方针。

相似文献

1
Computer analysis of qualitative data: a comparison of three packages.定性数据的计算机分析:三种软件包的比较
Qual Health Res. 1993 Feb;3(1):91-111. doi: 10.1177/104973239300300106.
2
Use of a computer software program for qualitative analyses--Part 2: Advantages and disadvantages.用于定性分析的计算机软件程序的使用——第2部分:优点和缺点。
West J Nurs Res. 1999 Jun;21(3):436-9. doi: 10.1177/019394599902100301.
3
How to critique qualitative research articles.如何批判性评价定性研究文章。
Can J Nurs Res. 1993 Winter;25(4):47-55; quiz 56.
4
Use of a computer software program for qualitative analyses--Part 1: Introduction to NUD.IST.用于定性分析的计算机软件程序的使用——第1部分:NUD.IST简介
West J Nurs Res. 1999 Feb;21(1):111-7.
5
Analysing qualitative research data using computer software.使用计算机软件分析定性研究数据。
Nurs Times. 2006;102(24):34-6.
6
Decision-making process of women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who have chosen prophylactic mastectomy.携带BRCA1或BRCA2基因突变且已选择预防性乳房切除术的女性的决策过程。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010 May;37(3):313-20. doi: 10.1188/10.ONF.313-320.
7
Coming to terms with perceived danger. A researcher's narrative.
J Holist Nurs. 2000 Mar;18(1):27-45. doi: 10.1177/089801010001800105.
8
[Pertinence of qualitative research: comparative approach in qualitative and quantitative research].[定性研究的相关性:定性研究与定量研究中的比较方法]
Rech Soins Infirm. 2000 Jun(61):13-22.
9
The ethical community consultation model as preparation for nursing research: a case study.伦理社区咨询模式作为护理研究的准备:一个案例研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2010 Nov;17(6):749-58. doi: 10.1177/0969733010379176.
10
Content analysis: method, applications, and issues.内容分析:方法、应用及问题。
Health Care Women Int. 1992 Jul-Sep;13(3):313-21. doi: 10.1080/07399339209516006.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the efficacy of computer games-based learning intervention in enhancing English speaking proficiency.
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 16;10(16):e36440. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36440. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
2
Nuance, complexity, and context: qualitative methods in genetic counseling research.
J Genet Couns. 1997 Mar;6(1):21-43. doi: 10.1023/a:1025659701805.